Page 2 of 2

Re: Tautopathy: Was Swine Fever Profiteering

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:28 am
by Irene de Villiers
Of course you are welcome to your opinion but as my gran said when I
was ten and she was ten times that and making profits in a 2 year old
business she started, "If you don't use it, you lose it" and she
meant the brain power she used daily to learn new things.
If one quits learning, one has "quit" altogether - in our shared
view. I suspect Hahnemann would agree - else why 6 Organons... the
last being close to his death time.
It depends how you look at it.
The principles are good but they can be implemented in new ways (as
hahnemann was wont to do) - and more principles can be added (as
Hahnemann was wont to do), and new remedies and information on them
can be added (as Hahnemann was wont to do)......
So if you prefer to leave it a dead science at the 1834 stage, that
is your prerogative. I see it as Hahnemann did - as a live and
growing science, needing good minds to take up where Hahnemann left
off. We have challenges to meet that he did not have. Must we put
blinkers on and not address them?
I think not.
Your saying so does not make it so:-)
Tautopathy has very valid usefulness in specific ways, as countless
homeopaths are aware, and they/we are not so dull-witted as to
continue using something that is useless:-)

Nobody here suggested using it instead of homeopathy in general, only
where indicated - though your asumptions about my own homeopathy
practice are scathingly worded with that invalid assumption and a
number of others thrown in as additional spiciness?
Maybe you enjoy writing defamatory fiction. Starting with "let us
assume" does not make it okay.

Really?
A picture is worth a thousand close-mouths!
"vindication"?
That is pure defamatory nonsense as is the rest which I'll edit out.
You have evidently failed to read any of my past posts here or
anywhere else.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Re: Tautopathy: Was Swine Fever Profiteering

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 am
by Liz Brynin
Hold on, David! Irene has a wealth of homeopathic knowledge - and some! She has a very clear grasp of homeopathic principles. And I'm also sure she could easily surpass you in knowledge of anatomy, physiology and pathology.
She has stated quite clearly that she will use whatever it takes to save a patient - that doesn't make her any less of a homeopath than you - just different. Maybe more rounded as a healer!!
I think you should be less sarcastic and more tempered in your comments!
Liz

Re: Tautopathy: Was Swine Fever Profiteering

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:21 am
by Dave Hartley
Hey Liz:

take your own advice !

There is no sarcasm intended.
Some rhetorical questions, to be sure.

Not sure why people are so prone to falling into pissing match mode.

This is not about the male equivalent of the size of ones genitalia.

This is about: being clear on "what is homeopathy."

FOR THE PURPOSE of supporting homeopathy...
FOR THE PURPOSE of supporting those who are learning homeopathy..
FOR THE PURPOSE of presenting to "the public" a cohesive & true
"experience of" .. "definition of" homeopathy.

I won't repeat my more recent post on this topic, but perhaps you'll
come across it.
By all means, Irene should do whatever Irene decides to do in her practice.

My concern is not about that (okay 1% about that, but it is still her
business.)

Are you "GETTING" that ?

If not, what part are you not getting?
warm wishes,
david 510.776.5914 fax: 510.336.6671
www.holistiq.com
www.DavidHartley.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer: www.iamResourceful.com

Re: Tautopathy: Was Swine Fever Profiteering

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:18 am
by Shannon Nelson
"Warm wishes", huh?
David, please clean up your language...

Re: Tautopathy: Was Swine Fever Profiteering

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:24 am
by Dave Hartley
Hey Shannon,

Why don't you try supposing that my language is well within the social norm for where I have lived most of my life, and that I mean what I am saying to be hopefully received "cleanly"

You are reading in something which I have not written.
You are welcome to attempt to educate me in why you see the need to mock my .sig

SINCERE warm wishes,
david 510.776.5914 fax: 510.336.6671
www.holistiq.com
www.DavidHartley.com
I.T. support: www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder: www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer: www.iamResourceful.com

Re: Tautopathy: Was Swine Fever Profiteering

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:42 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Hi Dave,

I'm sorry, it did come across and mocking, and that's not what I meant.
I was tired, and had already written and scrapped several
replies--when I shouldn't have been at the computer at all. I'll send
the rest of my thoughts privately, and try to better explain myself.
Best wishes,
Shannon

Re: Tautopathy: Was Swine Fever Profiteering

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:55 pm
by Liz Brynin
What I'm not getting is the tone you use in your emails! And if you don't understand that you sound sarcastic, let me educate you!
"I have little doubt that it would be futile to make any attempt at
contributing to the knowledge and experience you have of homeopathy,
as you have apparently become entangled in an embrace where you have
superior knowledge and we poor homeopaths who have studied and
practice and succeed according to what is defined and accepted as
homeopathy are mere blind fools, bereft of your stunning clarity of
vision."
You contrast - directly - Irene's 'knowledge and experience' with 'we poor homeopaths' but finish your comparison by saying that 'we...have studied and succeed according to what is accepted as homeopathy'. In other words, the poor homeopaths have the gold standard, but not Irene in spite of her 'knowledge and experience'. That's sarcasm - pure and simple - but you don't need me to tell you that, do you?
I don't appreciate that kind of tone - nor do I like the way you put 'pissing', 'male' and 'genitalia' in the same post.
And you don't need to SHOUT at me. I get where you're coming from just fine and clear. What you don't get is that you might be offensive to some - and that humility and an enquiring mind, which seeks to learn from others is far more attractive than posturing.
I apologise if I have annoyed you, but you might as well know what I find objectionable.
Liz