Hi Luise,
Ah, I see where you're going.
Okay, that is not the way I *recall* Hahnemann talking about it.
He talks about it as being automatic...
But that's a whole different tangent from what the article addresses,
or what I was trying to bring out. Why do you feel that's an important
point? I'm not quite getting it...
Constitutional versus specific remedy
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
-
Luise Kunkle
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:00 pm
Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy
Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
I was only replying to the one sentence the lecturer had said.
I am allergic to homeopaths putting statements into Hahnemann's mouth or
rather his pen that he never wrote.
If we want to claim that homeopathy is a science, we should use a bit of
scientific rigor in our statements.
Regards
Luise
I was only replying to the one sentence the lecturer had said.
I am allergic to homeopaths putting statements into Hahnemann's mouth or
rather his pen that he never wrote.
If we want to claim that homeopathy is a science, we should use a bit of
scientific rigor in our statements.
Regards
Luise

