Hi Tanya,
It was a rather long-ranging discussion, with the issue being more that
he *uses* protocols at all, rather than any particular ones. (Tho i do
remember one / some involved high potencies in a way that could make
some of us queasy
) Here's a sample post, in case it helps:
----------------------------------------------
Dear Luise,
It could be both.
I have a single remedy protocol for some pathologies, some tandem &
then one single remedy following & some where there are 2 remedies
alternating. But all these are not just baseless rx - they arise from
a need based situation where we have limited time to wait & watch or
pathologies which dont respond well to a constitutional rx. And all
these so called preset rx or protocols are well tested over many
patients & followed up well for a considerable period of time.
Its a fact that we have remedies which work better on alternations
than giving only one remedy at a time.
The very idea that patients on a protocol will quick results are all
going to die of a serious pathology later on & all those on a single
rx are going to become immortal or die without any other disease state
is a fiction & not a fact.
I dont mind rather do not debunk single remedy rx if you were such an
expert like David & others. But what harm is there if we develop
preset rx for such diverse pathologies that we see around today which
gives you predictive results than wait & watch what is going to
happen. Thats what I always call camel hunting in antarctica...
If we can bring some SUNSHINE to these camel hunters in antarctica
whats the harm. They can see better if there is really a camel
around.....
Regards
Somenath
--------------------------------------------------
[In my understanding, "protocol" means a procedure you follow / remedy
you give according to a single fact or few about the
circumstances--e.g. name of the disease and not much more--as opposed
to individualizing on basis of full casetaking. Some people were
objecting simply to that fact--insufficient individualization according
to classical approach--and / or to repetition (esp. sometimes of high
potencies) without first evaluating response to prior dose(s).]
Hope that helps!
Shannon