As a veterinary homeopath my advice is to use a people repertory and not
a so-called veterinary one.
The latter only restrict your choices. What we really need to do is use
a good people one - and enhance it with any new animal-related rubrics.
Radar is a good program for example - but I do not use "a veterinary
repertory" at all due to it being way too restrictive.
It's more important to be willing to convert animal rubrics to people
ones. For example if you have a broken tail, you may need to look at
spine, nerve, bone, tendon, ligament, skin etc rubrics, not tail
rubrics, if you see my point. You ALSO need to look at emotional rubrics
related to tail - for examlpe cats can't tolerate having no fur at the
tip of tail (and will likely chew their tail off there) and there will
be related (human repertory) mind symptoms such as anxiety, fear,
insecurity, irritation or whatever applies to the specific situation.
More importantly veterinary reps usually have VERY limited options
as they assume (incorrectly) that some rubrics can not be applied to
animals - and in fact that is the main reason they exist at all as
separate entities. I wish people would just upgrade the repertories we
have already where appropriate.
I made the same mistake many years ago. I actually went so far as to
highlight Kent and Boericke reps to show those rubrics that I felt were
potential animal ones. At the time I thought I was even "stretching it a
bit" but I did not want to omit anything that might remotely be useful.
Well how wrong I was. There is hardly a rubric that I did NOT highlight,
which has been left unused over the years. they ALL get used sooner or
later, and being restrictive in one's thinking there, is a big error!
The most seemingly impossible-for-animals rubrics are all used
eventually. Types of pain are seldom used - but their presence is still
relevant and now and then one sees what kind is involved. For example a
dog case had burning pain which I know because:
* the dog avoided things that burn during that illness; and
* the chosen remedy for burning pain worked.
So even the most unlikely sub-rubrics might one day be used - and
definitely far more WILL be used than one tends to think, from the human
repertory.
My point is that if you restrict yourself to an animal repertory you
will miss a LOT of correct remedies that need more detail in the
repertorizing to differentiate the right remedy. It's not worthwhile to
limit the options, because:
**** It only makes life *more* difficult - NOT easier!!! *****
You will have more failed cases and you will have a harder time finding
a good simillimum if you use a limited repertory.
So overall you will be a lot less successful.
Hence - stay with a full repertory like the people one from Radar or
other good software or books for *people*.
If the veterinary rubrics which folks want to add, can be *added* and
not seen as a separate repertory - then I'd be in favour of those
enhanced "people+animal integrated" repertories. But I do not advise use
of a "veterinary repertory" as such. Ever.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."