Responding [was: Is Homeopathy Bleeding To Death??

[Manjitpal Kahlon]

I remember having suggested Fifty Reasons for Becoming an Homeopath of Dr. Burnett, to those who had any doubts. These attacks are nothing new. I sure will call it an act of frustration when it is found and understood that Homeopaths often do something where they fail miserably. Let them read this Book and i SURE WILL BE HAPPY TO SEE THEM RESTART THIS DISCUSSION, ONCE AGAIN BY, BUT BY CLARIFYING THE QUESTIONS RAISED BY Dr. Burnett ABOUT THEIR OWN SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENTS . Let them understand and realize that the initial movement, the efforts and provings were done by those who had been part of so called "SCIENTIFIC' School. Yes they have to understand "Homeopathy is a Science, supported with Provings .. let them prove themselves in the similar process .. let them prove that it does not work .. let them study the Homeopathy in its real sense .. and they will understand.. it is not easy to be an Homeopath .. No short cuts in this science.. it needs accuracy .. with an Art to deal with this science"
And if they do not have courage and time to do so.. and want to stick to the Science .. answer being .. you have Headache .. cut the head off .. But Sorry .. I don't believe in such methods.. and in case they feel that only Placebo does this miracles .. accepted .. if placebo can do such wonders .. then why the Science wishes to Feed them Chemicals .. just to protect its own existence, they find at stake in presence of Homeopathy , and that too at the cost of making humanity suffer. So i leave it to them .. if they have an open mind let them answer .. at the very first place Dr. Burnett's Fifty Reasons for Being an Homeopath .. .. they can sure find the truth .. otherwise.. TRUTH NEVER CHANGES .. so why to bother to clarify about it ?
Paul

[Carol Orr]

got this from that sue young site: by richard feynman("scientist" who worked
on atom bomb and figured out first how the challenger exploded):

“Science is a method of finding things out. But if a thing is not
scientific, if it cannot be subjected to the test of observation, this does
not mean that it is dead, wrong or stupid. We are not trying to argue that
science is somehow good and other things are somehow not good. But there are
some things left out, for which the method does not work. This does not mean
that those things are unimportant. They are, in fact, in many ways the most
important.”

[Chat]

Not sure, but I think it's regularly updated in an e-book that he sells. http://www.homeopathic.com/ Should be something on his site.
Cheers, Elizabeth
________________________________

[Manjitpal Kahlon]

I agree, and that is where I prefer Burnett asking them in his Fifty Reasons, he is asking them, in open way, what should have other Science Followers done in those cases. Day by day, we see, we treat and we give results in cases of Tumors, Abscesses, Chronic Diseases .. so called incurable diseases, and if not cured, we keep them out of Hospitals where it has already been labeled as Incurable. Just for maintenance, if Homeopathy can afford cheaper, effective and simple way of keeping patients on move, why don't they do the same before they question.
I simply ask .. what is Science is is 2+2=4 or it is 2 and plus and two equal to Five. Let them decide. I damn care about some one's remarks as long I am confident that We are working on more solid Scientific way .. and I find absolutely no obligation to explain or give any clarifications, and who cares what others speak. If they want answer, they can search it .. they will find it scientific if they scientific approach .. not in instalments .. sure if the Body physically is the issue.. I feel difference in treating humans and trials of only pathological findings.