Re: do homeopaths generally believe that HERBS are merely FOOD & of limited use?
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:10 am
Herbalists: it depends where they have been trained and by whom. I have seen a trend towards "scientific" herbalism where most of the training is according to phytochemistry (Mills and Bone are the major proponents), with mentions that it often confirms the traditional use; fantastic for my scientific mind but it leaves out experience that cannot be "explained" or "rationally" justified; the training provided by Michel Tierra and Moore is much more oriented towards traditional herbalism with mention of scientific research.......as usual combining both approaches gives you the best result.
The case taking again is dependent on the school and some are very allopathic with disease labels, others are more individualistic.........many herbalists I know in the UK disregard homeopathy totally, but here in NZ there is a convergence that has been happening because of the common political fight for recognition........and because I keep giving talks of each one to the other ones, showing the commonalities, and yes I do take credit for that.........
I am just completing a second round of TCM studies as a refresher and to lead to an OMD........the principles are very different from homeopathy; basically the TCM practitioner aims at resetting the energetic pattern to normal, trusting the vis medicatrix natura to then complete the healing and maintain health,;it is a rebalancing exercise that is very powerful and very profound but not individualized like homeopathy because it relies on regularizing the patterns of energy of the patient, but not the patient himself......I hope I am making myself clear enough.
And Chinese herbalism is very complicated, I must admit I do not use the formulas as taught, but the individual herbs as per specific activity.
I do use a lot of herbal remedies (with a soft spot for Gemmotherapy....) and we had lots of controversy on this and other lists as regarding the purity of homeopathy when using other techniques; let me repeat my approach: I need to provide relief to my patient, that is my commitment, followed by cure, or I need to bring the patient in a state of reactivity that will allow the remedies to work.
Using synergistic techniques and approaches allow for a faster cure and often a softer landing. Certainly in some cases I do not know exactly what cured/ameliorated, but in the majority I do because I know what the action of each component is and I can differentiate the results. For example a patient with adrenal burnout will never react to homeopathy; repair the endocrine system first, the patient will already feel better, the symptoms linked to the adrenal failure will disappear and you will have the real picture in front of you, allowing you to prescribe the proper remedy.
Sounds complicated when compared to the one remedy cure all way of practicing, but in reality it is not, it just needs a little bit more knowledge and your cure rate increases tremendously; that does not mean I do not attempt to have a cure in one remedy when possible, but I am not fixated on it.
Does that answer your questions?
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".
Go to www.lulu.com/content/1103716 for my new book "The Handbook of Gemmotherapy"
The case taking again is dependent on the school and some are very allopathic with disease labels, others are more individualistic.........many herbalists I know in the UK disregard homeopathy totally, but here in NZ there is a convergence that has been happening because of the common political fight for recognition........and because I keep giving talks of each one to the other ones, showing the commonalities, and yes I do take credit for that.........
I am just completing a second round of TCM studies as a refresher and to lead to an OMD........the principles are very different from homeopathy; basically the TCM practitioner aims at resetting the energetic pattern to normal, trusting the vis medicatrix natura to then complete the healing and maintain health,;it is a rebalancing exercise that is very powerful and very profound but not individualized like homeopathy because it relies on regularizing the patterns of energy of the patient, but not the patient himself......I hope I am making myself clear enough.
And Chinese herbalism is very complicated, I must admit I do not use the formulas as taught, but the individual herbs as per specific activity.
I do use a lot of herbal remedies (with a soft spot for Gemmotherapy....) and we had lots of controversy on this and other lists as regarding the purity of homeopathy when using other techniques; let me repeat my approach: I need to provide relief to my patient, that is my commitment, followed by cure, or I need to bring the patient in a state of reactivity that will allow the remedies to work.
Using synergistic techniques and approaches allow for a faster cure and often a softer landing. Certainly in some cases I do not know exactly what cured/ameliorated, but in the majority I do because I know what the action of each component is and I can differentiate the results. For example a patient with adrenal burnout will never react to homeopathy; repair the endocrine system first, the patient will already feel better, the symptoms linked to the adrenal failure will disappear and you will have the real picture in front of you, allowing you to prescribe the proper remedy.
Sounds complicated when compared to the one remedy cure all way of practicing, but in reality it is not, it just needs a little bit more knowledge and your cure rate increases tremendously; that does not mean I do not attempt to have a cure in one remedy when possible, but I am not fixated on it.
Does that answer your questions?
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".
Go to www.lulu.com/content/1103716 for my new book "The Handbook of Gemmotherapy"