breach babies

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
suriya56
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 4:09 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by suriya56 »

Dear Shannon

Yes indeed they did. I did not prescribe Pulsatilla empirically but
based on Similimum.
It did not include the constitutional picture , only the symptom picture

regards

Suriya
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Robert & Shannon Nelson
wrote:


Peter Boehm
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:00 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by Peter Boehm »

Hi Shannon!
sorry I dont recall whether the midwifes gave it according the symptoms or just because of the position.
I would like to see some symptoms of puls or tub to give any of them.
Peter

Robert & Shannon Nelson schrieb:


Robyn
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by Robyn »

Maybe its the baby that needs the remedy rather than the mother
For breech presentation: posterior face presentation, Banerji suggests Lycopodium 30C twice a week for the week prior to delivery. Begin at 34-36 weeks or when the presentation becomes fixed. He mentions the baby turning somersaults.
Robyn

Salome gam nan ben Urda, gan njber asala Hesporona!

Peace be on Earth, and among all beings!


Fran Sheffield
Posts: 676
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:00 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by Fran Sheffield »

I was a midwife prior to becoming a homeopath and I regularly prescribe Pulsatilla for malpresentations, especially breech. Puls is a remedy of poor tone and loose tissues and fibres - probably the reason why the foetuses of women needing it in pregancy end up every which way but head down. Head down is the most comfortable position for a baby, space wise, near term but if everything is loose it lies comfortably in any position. Of course, this is in the absence of other problems such as fibroids or placenta praevia that may be taking up room in the lower pole of the uterus and stopping the head from entering the pelvis.
Just over a week ago I prescribed Puls as a favour for a friend of a patient's without seeing her. Her baby was in a breech presentation - her obstetrician was wanting to turn the baby manually in a couple of days time. We started with a 30c - lots of movement from the baby but no change. After 4 doses went to 200C - again, lots of movement. On seeing the obstetrician, the baby was in an oblique lie (almost fully turned) and the obstetrician had to just "flip" it the final bit. But, within 2 days, the baby had turned and was breech again.
At this time I did not want to give any more Puls without seeing her so she was talked into coming in for an appointment. After the 200c not holding I was really wanting to give Med - open weeping during the consult, preferring to lie on abdo when not pregnant - but because there was also indigestion and nausea from ice-cream and fatty foods I stuck with the Puls and went to an M potency. This was confirmed further towards the end of the consult when she told me about her father having arrived to live with her in the latter part of her pregnancy and the emotional upheaval it was causing. His presence and erratic behaviour were dragging up old stuff of abandonment - he had left her and her mother and brother when they were young, only to wald in and out of their lives several times since then. This time she had hoped it would be different but was finding her hopes were being dashed again. I think the experience with her father was producing such a strong Pulsatilla state that a higher potency was needed to maintain change. I only saw her 2 days ago so do not yet know the outcome but fully expect it to be postive.
--

Best regards,

Fran mailto:FranSheffield@homeopathyplus.com.au


Luise Kunkle
Posts: 1180
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:00 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by Luise Kunkle »

Hi Shannon,
Is there any person who does not have at least some symptoms of any of
the "big" remedies?

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free from doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========


Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by Shannon Nelson »

Thanks Fran--seems like Puls is a winner for the situation! :-)
But I am (still) curious: Do/did you see other remedies sometimes
needed to turn a breech *instead* of Puls--did you on occasion see it
fail, or is it pretty much of a "specific" for the situation?
Thanks,
Shannon


Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by Shannon Nelson »

Good point Luise, and I guess I didn't phrase that well.
What I did mean to ask, was whether Puls is being seen to be successful
for that task even in women for whom one would be *disinclined* to
offer pulsatilla, in absence of that specific situation.
Shannon


John Harvey
Posts: 1331
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:00 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by John Harvey »

I prescribed Coffea for a posterior presentation on the basis of the
mother's symptoms. The baby turned around within half an hour and
delivered shortly afterward. Puls was clearly not indicated and would
have done nothing, as the symptoms of the mother's state -- no matter
that they may have included some in common with Puls -- were the
symptoms of a remedy very different from Puls.

Cheers --

John
--
------------------------------------------------------------------

"The economy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the environment, not the reverse."

-- Herman Daly


Gail
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:49 pm

Re: breach babies

Post by Gail »

Thanks everyone for all the input on this subject. If I hear back
from the mum about what happened I'll let you know.

She was pretty definitely not Pulsatilla constitutionally, and not in
a Pulsatilla state emotionally - but on the other hand, Pulsatilla is
a good organ remedy for the uterus and I don't know the state of the
uterus. Someone offered that Pulsatilla is often inidicated for the
poor uterine tone that means the baby has room to lie breach. Mum
said this baby was very small, so it could be that the size of the
baby is more relevant than the tone of the uterus in this case.

It's still driving me crazy that I can't find the original story that
I read that talked about it. I was so sure it was in Kent, but maybe
it's under a different remedy in the way he sometimes sidetracks into
comparisons.

Gail.
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "John Harvey"
wrote:
would
matter
suggests
at 34-36
baby turning
the reverse."


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”