Re: tetnus prevention
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:13 am
Pauline Ashford wrote:
I have not seen need of calendula topically to regranulate a puncture
wound as they have a small opening which closes readily. I use Calend
200c by mouth however to prevent infection, and continue it till the
would is healed not just externally (as it closes outside before it is
healed insuide) but internally.
(My prior answer addressed only the aspect of surface treatment
which advocated wetting to prevent air entry.)
I add in pyrogenium 200C if the treatment was late starting and there is
already pus present. However in my view, if the wound has pus it is
abscessed and you then treat it as an abscess and not just a puncture
wound - it needs a different approach.
With a puncture wound handled immediately properly, there will be no
infection.
Hence I do not use the "keep it wet and open" approach as an open
wound allows *in* more debris (and no a gauze which is wet is NOT
sterile), and the calend 200C works well to prevent infection when taken
by mouth, in my experience.
With damaged surface I like hypercal or at least calendula
externally, but I do not use it with deep puncture wounds with a tiny
readily closed entry.
flap type wound - it is the WETNESS of the dressing that keeps the wound
discharging and the Calendula is a good general antiseptic at the outer
level. It is the constant discharging from the wound that keeps the
tissue in the wound fairly clean>>
To me if it is discharging it is not clean, it is draining. The internal
approach *prevents* the development of pus and there is no draining needed.
It's different with a dirty wound like an abscess that has developed
over time. There is no pus right after a deep wound. It takes about a
day (sometimes more) to develop enough infection top generate pus.
I agree - there is no point in a deep wound trying to keep it open -
rather handle the fact that it is a puncture wound and not a surface
one. Hence I use Calend internally, and I like 200C for this where with
an abscess that is open and draining I'd use tincture made into a lotion.
>
There is no oxygenation from extracellular fluid - oxygen is carried in
the red blood cells. You can not prevent tetanus bacterial growth from
"oxygenated extracellular fluid". The area inside a puncture wound is
anaerobic and the bacteria will make toxin unless you have Ledum
preventing it.
>
The immune system does not help worth beans in tetanus if the bacterium
gets a chance to grow. The bacteria make a *toxin* (tetanus toxin) and
the immune system does nothing with the toxin, it's not designed to
fight toxins. Cytokines will try to help with production of macrocytes
to engulf bacteria, but it's a danagerous bacteria and usually makes
dangerous toxin before that.
scab and close off. This is dangerous if tetnus is present.>
It's going to be closed anyway - it needs to be handled as such.
By definition a puncture wound is closed.
>
Not with Ledum and Hypericum used. You can switch it all off in 2 days.
How?
(any why)
You can not cause continued discharge of a puncture wound without
significantly increasing tissue damage and giving the bacteria even more
damaged tissue on which to readily grow and make toxin. So while I
understand your theory it is impracticable. A puncture wound is just
that - it's important to *assume* the tetanus bacteria are in there
(till proved otherwise) and growing (till proved otherwise) and to
handle with appropriate remedy.
Any attempt after initial blood flow - to make the wound "continue to
discharge" is going to make things worse, not better.
How?
You can not expel any exotoxin nor can you reduce the bacterial growth
by artificially inducing the wound to "drain".
BEtter to assume the fact - it is a fact - thaty a puncture wound is
anaerobic and needsd ledum hypericum, and calend internally.
>
Our bodies are too slow for tetanus. We need remedy.
>
It's THEIR risk in that case.
Not OUR risk.
No offence - but I do not see how anyone making their own decision with
too little information is anyone else's legal risk.
The general population knows full well that tetanus shots are the
allopathic norm. What they do NOT know is what constitutes the
homeopathy norm.
>
Indeed but it is *their* decision.
>
True - but that too is the decision of the individual and does not
preclude our discussion of what WE feel is appropriate and safer.
>
The risk from tetanus is there or not there - no matter what the item is
which causes the puncture wound. Since Clostridium tetani is a normal
soil organism, the existence of soil in the area is the most relevant
factor - and it would be a mistake to think that time in the elements
has anything to do with it - you can equally get tetanus from a brand
new serrated brad. The only way rust would be relevant is in being able
to hold more soil than a smooth nail. But since it takes one bacterium
only to cause harm, I feel it is safer to ALWAYS handle a puncture wound
with the assumption that there IS tetanus involved.
The risk is not time-related and has nothing to do with being in the
elements.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
I have not seen need of calendula topically to regranulate a puncture
wound as they have a small opening which closes readily. I use Calend
200c by mouth however to prevent infection, and continue it till the
would is healed not just externally (as it closes outside before it is
healed insuide) but internally.
(My prior answer addressed only the aspect of surface treatment
which advocated wetting to prevent air entry.)
I add in pyrogenium 200C if the treatment was late starting and there is
already pus present. However in my view, if the wound has pus it is
abscessed and you then treat it as an abscess and not just a puncture
wound - it needs a different approach.
With a puncture wound handled immediately properly, there will be no
infection.
Hence I do not use the "keep it wet and open" approach as an open
wound allows *in* more debris (and no a gauze which is wet is NOT
sterile), and the calend 200C works well to prevent infection when taken
by mouth, in my experience.
With damaged surface I like hypercal or at least calendula
externally, but I do not use it with deep puncture wounds with a tiny
readily closed entry.
flap type wound - it is the WETNESS of the dressing that keeps the wound
discharging and the Calendula is a good general antiseptic at the outer
level. It is the constant discharging from the wound that keeps the
tissue in the wound fairly clean>>
To me if it is discharging it is not clean, it is draining. The internal
approach *prevents* the development of pus and there is no draining needed.
It's different with a dirty wound like an abscess that has developed
over time. There is no pus right after a deep wound. It takes about a
day (sometimes more) to develop enough infection top generate pus.
I agree - there is no point in a deep wound trying to keep it open -
rather handle the fact that it is a puncture wound and not a surface
one. Hence I use Calend internally, and I like 200C for this where with
an abscess that is open and draining I'd use tincture made into a lotion.
>
There is no oxygenation from extracellular fluid - oxygen is carried in
the red blood cells. You can not prevent tetanus bacterial growth from
"oxygenated extracellular fluid". The area inside a puncture wound is
anaerobic and the bacteria will make toxin unless you have Ledum
preventing it.
>
The immune system does not help worth beans in tetanus if the bacterium
gets a chance to grow. The bacteria make a *toxin* (tetanus toxin) and
the immune system does nothing with the toxin, it's not designed to
fight toxins. Cytokines will try to help with production of macrocytes
to engulf bacteria, but it's a danagerous bacteria and usually makes
dangerous toxin before that.
scab and close off. This is dangerous if tetnus is present.>
It's going to be closed anyway - it needs to be handled as such.
By definition a puncture wound is closed.
>
Not with Ledum and Hypericum used. You can switch it all off in 2 days.
How?
(any why)
You can not cause continued discharge of a puncture wound without
significantly increasing tissue damage and giving the bacteria even more
damaged tissue on which to readily grow and make toxin. So while I
understand your theory it is impracticable. A puncture wound is just
that - it's important to *assume* the tetanus bacteria are in there
(till proved otherwise) and growing (till proved otherwise) and to
handle with appropriate remedy.
Any attempt after initial blood flow - to make the wound "continue to
discharge" is going to make things worse, not better.
How?
You can not expel any exotoxin nor can you reduce the bacterial growth
by artificially inducing the wound to "drain".
BEtter to assume the fact - it is a fact - thaty a puncture wound is
anaerobic and needsd ledum hypericum, and calend internally.
>
Our bodies are too slow for tetanus. We need remedy.
>
It's THEIR risk in that case.
Not OUR risk.
No offence - but I do not see how anyone making their own decision with
too little information is anyone else's legal risk.
The general population knows full well that tetanus shots are the
allopathic norm. What they do NOT know is what constitutes the
homeopathy norm.
>
Indeed but it is *their* decision.
>
True - but that too is the decision of the individual and does not
preclude our discussion of what WE feel is appropriate and safer.
>
The risk from tetanus is there or not there - no matter what the item is
which causes the puncture wound. Since Clostridium tetani is a normal
soil organism, the existence of soil in the area is the most relevant
factor - and it would be a mistake to think that time in the elements
has anything to do with it - you can equally get tetanus from a brand
new serrated brad. The only way rust would be relevant is in being able
to hold more soil than a smooth nail. But since it takes one bacterium
only to cause harm, I feel it is safer to ALWAYS handle a puncture wound
with the assumption that there IS tetanus involved.
The risk is not time-related and has nothing to do with being in the
elements.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."