Re: Chronic Diseases (2)
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:51 am
Hi Ardavan,
This was not the problem - I think I understand quite well the basics
of your approach.
The problem has been that I did not then and do not now see
"tuberculinum"in the symptoms you have listed. Not from what I know
about the MM of tub, not from my knowledge of the acute stages of the
disease (it used to be quite common when I was a child etc.) not after
re-reading the MM in the MM's, not after repertorizing. "Rolling" the
head would have made me think of it (3rd grade) but I would not have
found it confirmed any other way any more than at least some of the
other remedies in that rubric.
So I was wondering whether there had been something else than what I
have used to lead you to a relative certainty that tub. was indicated.
Regards
Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========
This was not the problem - I think I understand quite well the basics
of your approach.
The problem has been that I did not then and do not now see
"tuberculinum"in the symptoms you have listed. Not from what I know
about the MM of tub, not from my knowledge of the acute stages of the
disease (it used to be quite common when I was a child etc.) not after
re-reading the MM in the MM's, not after repertorizing. "Rolling" the
head would have made me think of it (3rd grade) but I would not have
found it confirmed any other way any more than at least some of the
other remedies in that rubric.
So I was wondering whether there had been something else than what I
have used to lead you to a relative certainty that tub. was indicated.
Regards
Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========