Re: Not to rekindle the fires; but what real value, if any, do Sankaran
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 5:47 pm
Hi Sam,
Since this is supposed to be an answer to my post, I think I should
point out for people who do not bother to read my post again, that I
said nothing of the sort you claim to be answering to!
It is, however typical of the kinds of responses I have got on my
statements of fact - and these kinds of responses to my posts ant
those of others are what causes the mess you claim to regretting so
much.
Regards
Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========
Since this is supposed to be an answer to my post, I think I should
point out for people who do not bother to read my post again, that I
said nothing of the sort you claim to be answering to!
It is, however typical of the kinds of responses I have got on my
statements of fact - and these kinds of responses to my posts ant
those of others are what causes the mess you claim to regretting so
much.
Regards
Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========