Cervical Cancer Vaccine

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Ananda Ruchira
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 10:00 pm

Re: Cervical Cancer Vaccine

Post by Ananda Ruchira »

hi ALL.

Thanks to everyone contributing their views on this thread. You have given a far better articulation of ideas than I could piece together. I had really wound myself into a hole with trying to put it together.

My "debate" is with some potential partners-that-might-be who want to do "cervical cancer screening". Your emails have led to the answers I was looking for. From the hints given in your emails, I can understand the underlying motives of these parties. What I suspect (not yet verified) is they want to use Africans as their guinea pigs for testing or for other allopathic-supporting stats, etc.

You've now given me some "ammunition" to counter with and also firmed up my moral stand on the issue.
Sincerely,
Didi Ananda Ruchira
Director, Abha Light
visit: www.abhalight.org
tel: +254 20 445-0181 / cells: 0733-895466 / 0723-869133
skype: anandarucira
----------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------
"easy access to the world"


Dale Moss
Posts: 1544
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Cervical Cancer Vaccine

Post by Dale Moss »

Hi, Didi --
Re your suspicions about using Africans as guinea pigs, did you see (or read) "The Constant Gardener"?
Peace,
Dale


Luise Kunkle
Posts: 1180
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:00 pm

Re: Cervical Cancer Vaccine

Post by Luise Kunkle »

Hi Soroush,

I do not contradict anything you say.
but your statement or that of Coulter was:

"Also based on Harris Coulter's book vaccinations affected the
behaviour of the vaccinated"

Which sounds pretty generalized. In such cases, negative instances are
indeed relevant. If the statement had been "MAY have affected SOME" or
even "affected SOME" the matter would be different.

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”