Re: Scientific medicine, was: Ancient Wisdom and Acute diseases- the Paradox - PLEASE READ
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:37 am
On 2/15/07, Chris Gillen wrote:
[snip]
In particular, the footnote to aph. 67 refers to use of allopathic
palliatives in the most urgent cases, "to stimulate the irritability
and sensibility (the physical life)".
We're in agreement that Hahnemann should not have tolerated "mongrel
homoeopathy"; I was merely acknowledging that he might have made
allies of some rather than enemies had he left their egos intact. On
the other hand, my memory of the history of events leading up to
publication of his criticisms is hazy; perhaps he had already given
that approach its chance.
Cheers --
John
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
The sick are entitled to exact knowledge, not to guesswork.
-- James Tyler Kent
[snip]
In particular, the footnote to aph. 67 refers to use of allopathic
palliatives in the most urgent cases, "to stimulate the irritability
and sensibility (the physical life)".
We're in agreement that Hahnemann should not have tolerated "mongrel
homoeopathy"; I was merely acknowledging that he might have made
allies of some rather than enemies had he left their egos intact. On
the other hand, my memory of the history of events leading up to
publication of his criticisms is hazy; perhaps he had already given
that approach its chance.
Cheers --
John
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
The sick are entitled to exact knowledge, not to guesswork.
-- James Tyler Kent