Page 2 of 2

Re: Hahnemannian homeopathy VS. combos LONG

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:46 pm
by Shannon Nelson
I don't think that--whether "Stanza 3 suffices"-- is what we've been
debating! The broader debate, and the one we started with and keep
coming back to, is whether the list must exclude all mention and all
discussion of any topics not related to non-Hahnemannian homeopathy.
This would be a huge departure from this list's "tradition", and from
the wishes of what appears to me to be the majority of the list
membership.

If we are *not* moving to exclude everything non-Hahnemannian, then
where are we--or I guess I should ask where are you, Joy--moving to
draw the lines--excluding discussions of combos only, or excluding
combos and Sankaran and Scholten, or ??

Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Hahnemannian homeopathy VS. combos LONG

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:14 pm
by Joy Lucas
Actually the original debate was about the justification of combination
rx not what we should be discussing - although I for one don't want
them promoted for reasons already stated - do we need to keep stating
this, hope not.

why we have taken up the diversion of discussing celebrity homeopaths
instead seems to be a camouflage regarding that justification and that
keeps the discussion going in many shapes and forms but still avoids
the crux - "here to take the discussions further is what I wrote in my
original text".

right now I am having trouble posting and reading and trawling through
messages is dire - so apologies if any messages to me are left
unanswered, there is obviously a glitch with yahoo and maybe you won't
even read this, who knows. Joy

http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/provings

Re: Hahnemannian homeopathy VS. combos LONG

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 11:15 pm
by muthu kumar
True Joy-
It has been going all over the place now- I agree that combinations
are not in Organon- like some methods by celebrities are not there in
specific terms-

I think in an otherwise "classical" list occasional mention of
combination by another homeopath is not to be frowned upon. May be one
who posts like that can label it "non-classical" use or whatever like
Gaby suggested, if that could signal to elite noses that they should
turn away or close down temporarily...

may be that might be the solution for now and to stop the spinning the
wheels here...

I shall not post anything about this any more, Thanks for the joyful
ride ;-)
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Joy Lucas wrote:
prescribe the
way of