Page 2 of 4

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:21 pm
by muthu kumar
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "robin9168" wrote:
How else ;-)

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:41 pm
by Kerry
I don't think any of the discussions on combos are about people being
holier than thou, I think it is about people being able to comprehend
the differences so that they can make informed decisions. I certainly
want to make informed decisions about my health and believe that
everyone has the right to do it about theirs.

Kerry

itself?

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.7/454 - Release Date:
21/09/2006

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:07 pm
by muthu kumar
People can comprehend the differences one way or other Kerry-
If you want to present a single facet to the public there is a lot
more cleaning to do in Homeopathy than stopping combinations.

If I get a patient and I give her a medicine which I say has 5
medicines in combination she would not think it bizarre. But if I say
I know the medicine is right for her because I proved it in my dream
or using collective unconscious or because the virus that affected had
a delusion or because the saree she is wearing reminded me of a snake
skin- that is when she would look askance at me.

So if there is going to be a witch hunt there is more in homeopathy to
hunt out than people using combinations- if not then people should not
criticize people who report honestly about what they are doing
despite holy ghosts screaming to cut throats...

you are talking about informed decisions- that is what Didi did-
informing us of her experience - so go make your decision - if
combinations do work, it is better to see where it will fit and make a
case for using it in a limited way and seeing how it will help the
cause of homeopathy rather than putting the people who speak out under
the guillotine

do not preach to the choir - people who use combinations are not the
ones you need to convince of homeopathy-
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "kerry" wrote:

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:22 pm
by Kerry
I haven't said that only a single facet should be presented to the
public; I said that both the combos and the Classical should be
explained when people are offered combos and then they can make an
informed decision.

Kerry

being
comprehend
certainly
rules
purists
not
call
being
quanity
and
medica
do
them
within a
with
strict
Homoeopathy
any
this
out of
site or its
incidental, special,
your
single
21/09/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.7/454 - Release Date:
21/09/2006

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:34 pm
by muthu kumar
Sure - good, thanks

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "kerry" wrote:

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:35 pm
by Simon King LCPH MARH
hear hear!

kind regards

Simon King
44 (0)1603 466092
(include the zero in brackets only if calling from the UK)
http://www.Homeopathy-Help.net
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:48 pm
by Simon King LCPH MARH
hear hear (again!) -exactly why I don't bother posting here much
anymore - too much hypocrisy

Simon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:53 am
by Luise Kunkle
Hi Simon,

I see your point - but don`t people who try not to be need some
support on the lists from the others. There are probably many of them
who think the same way, but do not post.

I for one have practically stopped posting on the lists because of
such lack of public support. I get pms, telling me "to keep it up" -
but after 8 years or so of it even I got fed up with it.

I much fear that people like Hahnemannian will go that way - a way
that so many have gone before me over the years.

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free from doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:58 am
by Dr. Lau
Dear All,

Like treating human only ? Because Hahnamann was a human physician ( not a
vet. yet )! What was added to Hahnamaanian Homeopathy after his death may
be discussed through other grouping. IMHO, treating non-human is certainly
of no interest in this group at the moment ?

Thank you.

Dr. Lau

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:13 am
by Joy Lucas
where's the hypocrisy, Simom?