Thank you Sheri
and
Thank you Joy.
It is difficult for some people changing from an allopathic point of view if one is brought up in it. The thinking process is there fdrom childhood, allopathic. And until one really gets Hahnemann on a deeper level , from, say, Chronic Diseases, than the allopathic upbringing, one is bound to keep thinking allopathically. Thank is the only sense that I can understand from all the posts that Sheri has so graciously and painstakingly has answered.
People feel like they are doing something by bringing their children for vacinations. Possibly Sherri could list alternatives to vacinations again for those who are somewhat open minded. Of course if the mind is made up in the other direction then there is no point in continuing to wheedle, as you infer, Joy.
Hahnemann himsself discusses causes, factors, etc. He himself states that bacteria do not cause disease. A reread of Chronic Diseases or a study from David Little's online library may refresh.
Thank you.
Brian
Joy Lucas wrote:
Oh for heaven's sake and for the sanity of most people on this list
going with this discussion, you have completely missed the point.
Regardless of whether or not there is a corruptive coercion going on in
the big wide world (and you'd have to have your eyes shut if you
thought there wasn't) the whole point being made is that getting up
front and personal with the bacteria, virus, germ, noxious substance,
i.e. naming them, is not an important part of our case analysis. Unless
you have extensive lab work done to assist you in naming a rogue
substance, which can be erroneous and circumspect at best and time
wasting at worst, it should not be part of your rubric selection, sx
ranking, or choice of rx. The most important decision in acutes is how
life threatening is this, what is the likely progress of the condition,
what organs are involved - THAT definitely has to be ranked, then you
take the sx and prescribe on them.
This is NOT to say that aetiology in disease is not important - it very
much is so and is intimately linked to the individual but it just
doesn't include naming a particular type of bacteria, virus, germ etc
that bears no real relation to the sx and the individual.
I would encourage people to read the little booklet edited by P
Sankaran "The Importance of Aetiology In Homepathy". Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/provings
edited for the sake of decency otherwise I might have been rude and
then I'd have the minerals on my back
Visit Minutus Website at
http://www.minutus.org
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, you can simply change your setting at
http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a single daily digest.
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]