"Believe"???????????
Since when should we include beliefs in our practices?????
Someone claims there is a remedy, however produced, able to cure at low cost
a life-threatening health situation that has characteristic common signs,
symptoms and evolution.
That deserves investigation; apparently it is done, clinically, by quite a
few groups.
Any substance capable of curing symptoms in the sick should be able to cause
them in the healthy, right?
What is the problem trying to demonstrate that with a proving, whether the
creator of the substance thinks it is necessary or not???
Seems to be a lot of running after one own's tail here, I just don't get it.
Semantics again???.....
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".
PC Remedies - Proving
Re: PC Remedies - Proving
Actually Shannon what you say isn't correct. the whole design of the
remedy (hopefully for the last time) is that there is first design,
then materia medica, then remedy - so that the materia medica is
already in the remedy. It isn't a question of whether or not Chappell
knows what would come from a proving, he knows already that the materia
medica is intrinsic - that is why there is no need for the proving. In
this respect he has already said there is no need for provings.
Hahnemannian homeopaths might want to insist on a proving and even if
chappell wanted this he could never guess what sx would come from it,
who could do that anyway? Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
remedy (hopefully for the last time) is that there is first design,
then materia medica, then remedy - so that the materia medica is
already in the remedy. It isn't a question of whether or not Chappell
knows what would come from a proving, he knows already that the materia
medica is intrinsic - that is why there is no need for the proving. In
this respect he has already said there is no need for provings.
Hahnemannian homeopaths might want to insist on a proving and even if
chappell wanted this he could never guess what sx would come from it,
who could do that anyway? Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: PC Remedies - Proving
That's what people do. Investigate away but it ain't homeopathy. Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: PC Remedies - Proving
We have a basic disagreement, but I'm tired of arguing it.
Best wishes,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Best wishes,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

