Dana Ullman's newest article at Huffingtonpost on Dysfunct...

[John R. Benneth]

I haven't bothered to look at it lately, but if you want to have a good laugh, follow Wikipedia's links supporting their placebo hypothesis for homeopathy . . they have to keep changing them because there isn't any real scientific support for it. In the past they've gone to Edzard Ernst misquoting Linde, and when that blew up in their faces they went to the NIH, which says nothing about it at all. What is it now, I haven't looked, still the NIH?
Another thing they have to do is skip and deny the biochemical and physical studies which show psychosomatic free effects. It's really pretty funny to see how desperate they are to maintain the null hypothesis and keep from getting locked into their own pillories..
Wolves hide in sheep's clothing, and sheepskin is what degrees are printed on. But I'll tell you one thing for sure, it certainly isn't bulletproof, it isn't even fingerproof.
If you do it hard enough you can poke holes in it just by looking at it . . LOL . . and you know it's junk science when it's got Randi's smudgey little paw prints all over it.
John (not the baptist)
In a message dated 10/11/2014 4:56:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)