Is there any logical reason LMs can not gain the amplification benefit when taken in F series?
They're already immediately available for order at least upto LM34 at Helios for many remedies, upto LM100 for others
3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233
3 = 3
5 is 3×5 = 15 equivalent
8 is 15×8 = 120 equivalent
13 is 120×13 = 1560 equivalent
21 is 1560×21 = 32760 equivalent
34 is 32760x 34 = 1113840 equivalent
55 is 1113840x 55 = 61216200 equivalent
The Fibonacci sequence is independent whether it's X, C or LM.
The few cases I've read haven't needed to go past 55C
I've finished a new 200C in 25 water doses over a month.
Generally I'd move from 200C to LM4 and progress as usual but feel like experimenting and start from LM3 or LM5 and go F
Right now I'll bide time with a 201C
Surely would save a-lot of $$$!
Susan
LM taken in F Series
-
Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: LM taken in F Series
LM/Q are linear potencies.
LM1 is the equivalent of a 5C with a constant multiplicator of 2 (the maths are in "The Potency", page 152 and 153)
LM2 = 2*6C
.
.
.
LM10 = 2*14C
LM20 = 2*24C, etc.....
So how do you plan to do that? LM1, LM3, LM5, LM8, etc,...? it is of course possible but then you miss out on the intermediate LM potencies that are prepared differently than the C or X potencies and on the slow, constant progression and exponential multiplication of the C potencies given in an F series.
I am not saying it would not work, I have no idea and would welcome any trial of combining both systems. It might give yet another avenue of prescribing.....practitioners need to try...
Who has published cases that do not need to go past 55C????? the whole point of doing the FULL series is to NOT miss any potential action of extremely (admittedly calculated) potencies.
My own experience has been that if I stop somewhere in the middle, I have eventually to complete the series to get rid of residual complaints still covered by the same remedy, as described in the book.
But if it appeals to anybody, who prevents you to try, have a few hundred cases and publish the results.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
LM1 is the equivalent of a 5C with a constant multiplicator of 2 (the maths are in "The Potency", page 152 and 153)
LM2 = 2*6C
.
.
.
LM10 = 2*14C
LM20 = 2*24C, etc.....
So how do you plan to do that? LM1, LM3, LM5, LM8, etc,...? it is of course possible but then you miss out on the intermediate LM potencies that are prepared differently than the C or X potencies and on the slow, constant progression and exponential multiplication of the C potencies given in an F series.
I am not saying it would not work, I have no idea and would welcome any trial of combining both systems. It might give yet another avenue of prescribing.....practitioners need to try...
Who has published cases that do not need to go past 55C????? the whole point of doing the FULL series is to NOT miss any potential action of extremely (admittedly calculated) potencies.
My own experience has been that if I stop somewhere in the middle, I have eventually to complete the series to get rid of residual complaints still covered by the same remedy, as described in the book.
But if it appeals to anybody, who prevents you to try, have a few hundred cases and publish the results.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
-
Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: LM taken in F Series
LM/Q are linear potencies.
LM1 is the equivalent of a 5C with a constant multiplicator of 2 (the maths are in "The Potency", page 152 and 153)
LM2 = 2*6C
.
.
.
LM10 = 2*14C
LM20 = 2*24C, etc.....
So how do you plan to do that? LM1, LM3, LM5, LM8, etc,...? it is of course possible but then you miss out on the intermediate LM potencies that are prepared differently than the C or X potencies and on the slow, constant progression and exponential multiplication of the C potencies given in an F series.
I am not saying it would not work, I have no idea and would welcome any trial of combining both systems. It might give yet another avenue of prescribing.....practitioners need to try...
Who has published cases that do not need to go past 55C????? the whole point of doing the FULL series is to NOT miss any potential action of extremely (admittedly calculated) potencies.
My own experience has been that if I stop somewhere in the middle, I have eventually to complete the series to get rid of residual complaints still covered by the same remedy, as described in the book.
But if it appeals to anybody, who prevents you to try, have a few hundred cases and publish the results.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
LM1 is the equivalent of a 5C with a constant multiplicator of 2 (the maths are in "The Potency", page 152 and 153)
LM2 = 2*6C
.
.
.
LM10 = 2*14C
LM20 = 2*24C, etc.....
So how do you plan to do that? LM1, LM3, LM5, LM8, etc,...? it is of course possible but then you miss out on the intermediate LM potencies that are prepared differently than the C or X potencies and on the slow, constant progression and exponential multiplication of the C potencies given in an F series.
I am not saying it would not work, I have no idea and would welcome any trial of combining both systems. It might give yet another avenue of prescribing.....practitioners need to try...
Who has published cases that do not need to go past 55C????? the whole point of doing the FULL series is to NOT miss any potential action of extremely (admittedly calculated) potencies.
My own experience has been that if I stop somewhere in the middle, I have eventually to complete the series to get rid of residual complaints still covered by the same remedy, as described in the book.
But if it appeals to anybody, who prevents you to try, have a few hundred cases and publish the results.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz