[Good_Kefir_Grains_OffTopicChat] Physician: 8 Reasons I Haven't Vaccinated My Daughter

[Roger B]

Dear you'all,

I found this article about vaccinations to be very well written and balanced and broad. The only thing I can think of that it did not cover is that we don't know what vaccinations are doing to our genes and our epigenes.

I love the phrase "tobacco science" that you will find in the article. I will be using that phrase more and more.

I got this article from Patricia Robinette, a very busy purveyor of health information indeed. I have cleaned up the arrows and set it up to look like an original from me, but it originated from Patricia.
8 Reasons I Haven't Vaccinated My Daughter
BY JAMES MASKELL NOVEMBER 6, 2013 12:56 PM EST
As a physician working with underserved populations, I’ve personally cared for people who have died of complications related to infectious diseases. There’s a lot of confusing information in the media about vaccines, so I wanted to share what we do know in case this information could save a life... Read
This is a very sensitive topic, and before I go further, let me first point out that the title of this post is not “8 Reasons Why You Should Not Vaccinate Your Child.” This is my personal decision based on research, and I am glad to live in a country where some choice is still afforded to those who wish to abstain.
A real conversation about vaccines is almost nonexistent in the media, where people are often segregated into either the “pro” or “anti” camps. When I speak to people about this directly, on the other hand, the conversation is always more nuanced and complex. While I certainly acknowledge the historical data that back up vaccine effectiveness, it might be time to have a fresh discussion.
My hope in writing this post is to promote honest and mutually respectful discourse, not to further polarize this topic. My daughter is only six months old right now, and I may consider changing my mind. I only hope you, the reader, are as open. I invite you to share your thinking in the comments section.
1. I fear the risk of complications from vaccines more than I fear the risk of complications from infection.
I am not fearful of short-term infections that come and go, like chicken pox. I had it growing up, and it would leave my daughter with lifetime natural immunity. Furthermore, the “long-term consequences of preventing natural exposure to agents covered by vaccine are not known.”
I am much more fearful of what comes through that needle, because the risks of vaccine side effects are real. Additionally, vaccine side effects are largely underreported because the passive nature of the legal system puts the onus on the victim to make the connection, file extensive paperwork, and report the issue.
Here is just a small list of potential side effects:
· Increased risk of respiratory infections after receiving the flu vaccine
· Guillain-Barre Syndrome
· Febrile seizures
· Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (brain damage)
· Ovarian failure
· Intussusception
· Neuropraxia
· Autism or multiple sclerosis
· Seizure, temporary pain, deafness, coma, or death (although the CDC states that coma, deafness, and death, "are so rare that it is hard to tell whether they are caused by the vaccine")
Please know, I am not saying that vaccines cause ALL these chronic diseases, but we are getting precious few answers as to what is causing them. Until we really understand the mechanisms of this issue, I am not willing to take that risk.
2. I can vaccinate my daughter, but she can contract the infection anyway.
No vaccine is 100% effective. Some tout 95% effectiveness, others less than that. Last year’s flu vaccine was 56% effective in adults and children and only 9% effective in the elderly.
Furthermore, it has been repeatedly determined that fully vaccinated children (and adults) can still get the infection the vaccines are designed to prevent. In fact, in recent outbreaks of whooping cough, the majority of those affected were fully vaccinated. Researchers have also speculated that some forms of whooping cough are becoming resistant to vaccines. Either way, with suboptimal efficacy and proven risks, this is not a chance I am willing to take.
3. I don’t trust drug companies.
In theory, scientific studies help us to separate fact from fiction. However, this recent review of scientific literature caught my attention. It warns about drug companies’ heavy influence on all aspects of health care research and strategy. The industry “masterfully influences evidence base production, evidence synthesis … and professional decisions. [sic]” Given that, how can I be sure I am getting science, not marketing?
My faith in pharmaceutical companies isn’t helped by the fact that they’ve paid more than $11 billion in fines from 2009 to 2012 for criminal wrongdoing. Admittedly this wasn’t because of vaccines, but the point is that these companies have a track record of not being trustworthy. What’s worse is that these huge sums are just considered “the cost of doing business,” as they pale in comparison to the profits they make.
4. I cannot sue the doctor, the nurse, or the drug company if there are serious side effects.
Unlike other drugs or products on the market, if my daughter has a serious, or even deadly, reaction to a vaccine, I cannot go all "Erin Brokovich" and sue the doctor, the nurse, the drug company, or form a class action lawsuit with others.
Thanks to the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986, the “Vaccine Court” was established within the Court of Federal Claims. By 2010, this program had paid nearly $2 billion in compensation to injured parties who said their health issues were caused by vaccines.
5. We don’t know enough about the human microbiome to understand how it could be affected by vaccines.
In the last two years, we've learned a lot more about our interaction with microbes. We now know we have 10 times as many germs as cells in the body (collectively called the human microbiome), and that more than 99% of them are mutually beneficial, supporting our digestion, immunity and metabolism. We need them and they need us, and the quicker we learn this lesson, the better.
How does this relate to vaccines? First, new research from Stanford University shows that adults can develop immunity to microbes they've never encountered, which goes against the traditional immunity dogma that you have to be exposed to the germ itself. Could there be a less risky way of gaining broad-spectrum immunity?
Secondly, we have precious little understanding of how vaccines affect microbial balance, but we do have a history of making interventions that seem like a good idea at the time, but backfire spectacularly. Just this week, the CDC Deputy Director said we have reached the end of the antibiotics era.
There are some obvious parallels here. For the majority of the 20th century, antibiotics were seen as our best tool for dealing with all bacterial infections. Now, after generations of killing off bacteria with antibiotics, we’re starting to see the negative side effects of this strategy. Not only are we breeding antibiotic-resistant bacteria, but the destruction of our microbiome is linked to many chronic diseases which have no known cure. It seems clear to me that vaccines at least have the same potential.
6. The mechanism of herd immunity is not fully understood, and some believe it's over-hyped.
Up until this point, I have focused on those factors that directly affect my daughter. Unlike any other medical intervention, population-based vaccine strategy also relies on the "herd" to protect weaker members, providing the rationale for forcing everyone to vaccinate their children.
However, there are some reasons to question the notion of vaccine-induced herd immunity. First, the mechanism of herd immunity is not fully understood. Second, it is failing, and third, certain vaccines are proving to provide less durable immunity than previously thought, meaning our current assumptions about herd immunity rates are likely overestimated. Furthermore, disease can spread in fully vaccinated populations, with examples both in measles andmumps.
7. I have researched the ingredients in vaccines. They are toxic, I do not want them injected into my daughter.
This study says it better than I can: “According to the US Food and Drug Administration, safety assessments for vaccines have often not included appropriate toxicity studies because vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic.” However, according to the CDC, the following toxins are commonly found in vaccines: Aluminum, egg protein, antibiotics, formaldehyde, MSG and thimerosal. I have serious objections to injecting any of these into my daughter.
With one in six kids in America now having a developmental delay, and one in 88 kids in America with autism, surely it is as much my responsibility to help protect my kids from these issues as it is to protect them from an acute infection? It is more and more clear that autism is a disease born of environmental causes, not genetics, and aluminum, among others, is being fingered as a possible culprit.
Also, several new vaccines, like Gardasil, were fast-tracked through the evaluation process which is worrying when even drugs that have been shown to be safe in initial studies have subsequently proved to be toxic or carcinogenic, like birth control pills or the Vioxx debacle.
8. I’m a new dad. I’ve seen scientists get it wrong before, and I don’t want my daughter to be a statistic.
Between the 1920s and 1960s, the same groups that are used to sell vaccines today (doctors, industry marketing, etc.) were used to sell cigarettes, and this has become known as "tobacco science." As we all know, "those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
Until we see a clear distinction between science and marketing, it’s likely that these same forces are still at work. Drug companies have a lot of work to do to regain my trust, and until that happens, I have to take full responsibility for my daughter’s health, even if it includes breaking cultural norms.
Speaking of full responsibility, I am actively engaged in improving her health and immunity through natural methods. It started with a natural birth, continued with exclusive breast feeding, and getting outdoors as much as possible. We have an amazing pediatrician and chiropractor who support our choices.

----------
About the Author
James Maskell
James Maskell is CEO of Revive Primary Care, a new project dedicated to restoring the health of America. By combining proven, dedicated, holistic doctors and practitioners with a scalable, digital, education platform, our intention is to inspire a revolution of empowered health advocates, like you!
To stay up to date with this exciting project, join our mailing list at Revive Primary Care, or connect with us on social media.

[Irene de Villiers]

Excellet article. There is a lot more that one can add but that is more than enough to convince anyone with two grey cells to knocked together.
A few thoughts:

* This year's flu vaccine says in the fine print insert "This vaccine has not been scientifically shown to be efficatious against the flu"

Huh?

* The thymus gland is our first line of defence against BOTH chronic and acute infections. A vaccine destroys its effectiveness, leaving ONLY the backup antibody system - MAYBE.
ALL the chronic disease resistance is gone, along with first line of dsefence acute.
It is called a "Th-2 Skewed system" as the bone marrow where antibodies are made, is overstimulated to the detrimennt of the TH-1 system originating in the THYMUS.

* If one uses natiural infection to develop immunity - as I did with my kids by letting then get chicken pox etc - research shows this STRENGTHENS the THYMUS - which strengthens BOTH chronic disease reistance and acute disease resistance.
Guess what - our overvaccinated society is crawling with chronic disease. Wonder why?

* Drug companies promote frequent use of vaccines and easily get away with it despite haveing zero science for it. Especially in pets. There are a lot more pets (read bucks for vaccines) than humans, so if they can get the poor animals shot up with this junk annually for a dozen things, who cares how many die of seizures the next month or vaccine associated sarcoma painfully a year later or drop dead of acute reactions - nobody is counting THEM as adverse events - and what a wonderful profit can be generated. You hardly need gardasil and flu vacs then.

* Annual vaccines have this ethics code behind them:
Drug company invents new vaccine and shoots up many animals with it. Let's say a lot of them are still alive a year later. This PROVES that the vaccine is "good for a whole year" - THERFORE the animals must be revaccinated every year, as there is no proof it is good for two years. (Take a titer test you say? WHY? It might mess up our profits if people see that the titer stays high for life). If the competition making vaccines gets stiff, then you retest after three years and come out with a new label for the same vaccine that says it is good for three years. Now you have two vaccines developed for the price of one. Cool. Let vets sell the 3-year labelled one at higher cost, after all it is special - it lasts three years. They can sell it with the old label still in states where a 3 yr vaccine is not an option or state law requires annual vaccine, thanks to the drug comnpany ethic being converted to law. At the cinic where I worked, it was a simpe matter of writing 3 yrs or 1 yr on the v et certificate (default 1 yr, more income for the vet) depending if the client demandsed a 3 year vaccine. The actual shot came out of the same bottle. Why not? They all last a lifetime of Th-2 skewed immune system.
* There are two categories of immune system skewed disease. TH-2 and TH-1.
Th-2 includes: allergies, asthma, cancer, lupus, cushings syndrome, arthritis, intracellular pathogens (TB, Bordetella/whooping cough, etc), FIP, FeLV, schizophrenia, HIV, FIV, scleroderma, sinusitis, ulcerative colitis, multiple chemical sensitivity, type 2 diabetes. and the list goes on....
Recognize any?
They should be VERy rare as th-1 system should have taken care of them all long before the bone marrow backup system got involved.
BY the way mercury and other vaccine adjuvants directly cause Th=2 skewing, wihtout the antibody production overload as well.

DO drug companies know the vaccines skew to TH-2? Yes.
DO they care?

Th-1 skewed diseases are things like multiple sclerosis, transfusion rejections, Type One diabetes, hashimotos thyroiditis, grave's disease.

In theory Th-1 disease should be far more common and Th-2 illness shoud bve extremely rare....

Maybe - before vaccines...

Namaste,
Irene

REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."