In a message dated 7/15/2002 10:11:29 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
Jdurfeeathome writes:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Book reoort/commentary
-
Sue Muller
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Book reoort/commentary
Hi there Barbara,
This is very interesting. A breath of fresh air.
of
This is an international problem. The background to how it happened is
interesting but goes beyond the scope of this present discussion.
to
You could say "classical principles as commonly taught internationally"
Nothing new in that. Keynote prescribing, for instance, is fine.
How is it? Frequent repetition, low potencies?
For example?
So did Boenninghausen.
drugs
Difficult to assess but a necessity in our day and age. Integration is the
name of the game.
completion
Naturally, if you're meaning a remedy based on a whole lot of
characteristics that are normal for that person and bear no relation to the
pathology.
As it is commonly taught. If you read Boenninghausen and put it into
practice you will find this is not strictly true.
the practitioner and client must sit and wait, sometimes a
So we are told!
Ramakrishnan explains that
It is so interesting that he has written this with Catherine coulter of all
people. She wrote those books on remedy pictures quite some years ago and
under Sul. she describes the cure of a case of prostate. As I was reading it
I thought "I simply don't believe this" and then lo and behold she said how
the patient had also received Sabal serrulata. That cured me of Catherine
coulter.
When you consider that
I would say some of these protocols are not new. It's just that the world
has lost the plot. I for one have never followed the world view of how
homeopathy should be done and I feel I have often been more successful than
most (and attacked plus plus plus).
How many times have
You should have read an article here in a magazine put out by adherents to
the current teachings. it was so tragic (exactly in this vein) and was the
lead story - I felt sick and cancelled my subscription forthwith.
The classical paradigm is not really the classical paradigm entirely at all.
Hope there will be many more books like this. Perhaps sanity will rule in
homeopathy, the nearly lost art, once again.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and
educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding
the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read
or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or
email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use
remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its
individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental,
special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the
subject of 'Digest' to ashahrdar@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This is very interesting. A breath of fresh air.
of
This is an international problem. The background to how it happened is
interesting but goes beyond the scope of this present discussion.
to
You could say "classical principles as commonly taught internationally"
Nothing new in that. Keynote prescribing, for instance, is fine.
How is it? Frequent repetition, low potencies?
For example?
So did Boenninghausen.
drugs
Difficult to assess but a necessity in our day and age. Integration is the
name of the game.
completion
Naturally, if you're meaning a remedy based on a whole lot of
characteristics that are normal for that person and bear no relation to the
pathology.
As it is commonly taught. If you read Boenninghausen and put it into
practice you will find this is not strictly true.
the practitioner and client must sit and wait, sometimes a
So we are told!
Ramakrishnan explains that
It is so interesting that he has written this with Catherine coulter of all
people. She wrote those books on remedy pictures quite some years ago and
under Sul. she describes the cure of a case of prostate. As I was reading it
I thought "I simply don't believe this" and then lo and behold she said how
the patient had also received Sabal serrulata. That cured me of Catherine
coulter.
When you consider that
I would say some of these protocols are not new. It's just that the world
has lost the plot. I for one have never followed the world view of how
homeopathy should be done and I feel I have often been more successful than
most (and attacked plus plus plus).
How many times have
You should have read an article here in a magazine put out by adherents to
the current teachings. it was so tragic (exactly in this vein) and was the
lead story - I felt sick and cancelled my subscription forthwith.
The classical paradigm is not really the classical paradigm entirely at all.
Hope there will be many more books like this. Perhaps sanity will rule in
homeopathy, the nearly lost art, once again.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and
educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding
the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read
or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or
email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use
remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its
individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental,
special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the
subject of 'Digest' to ashahrdar@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-
Jan Klüssendorf
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Book reoort/commentary
It is so interesting that he has written this with Catherine coulter of all
people. She wrote those books on remedy pictures quite some years ago and
under Sul. she describes the cure of a case of prostate. As I was reading it
I thought "I simply don't believe this" and then lo and behold she said how
the patient had also received Sabal serrulata. That cured me of Catherine
coulter.
Dear Sue,
Could you pls elaborate on this statement a little more.
Why do you say 'That cured me of Catharine Coulter' when you seem to be enthusiastic about Ramakrisshnan's approach who is doing the same thing but squared?
Jan
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
people. She wrote those books on remedy pictures quite some years ago and
under Sul. she describes the cure of a case of prostate. As I was reading it
I thought "I simply don't believe this" and then lo and behold she said how
the patient had also received Sabal serrulata. That cured me of Catherine
coulter.
Dear Sue,
Could you pls elaborate on this statement a little more.
Why do you say 'That cured me of Catharine Coulter' when you seem to be enthusiastic about Ramakrisshnan's approach who is doing the same thing but squared?
Jan
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]