I think relevant to this topic, this is a really thoughtful, interesting article from Mother Jones: "Fact-Free Nation: The science of why we don't believe science." (In part four he illustrates a point with a frustratingly clueless debunking of "vaccine denialists", but that is not the point of the article, so don't be distracted by it...)
I haven't yet read and digested the article fully, or I'd say more about it, but I think he raises points that we'd all do well to take in and consider. An interesting read!
Shannon
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/03 ... ris-mooney
article re believing [was: Part 1 of Paul Smith's 'investigation'
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
-
Fran Sheffield
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:00 pm
Re: article re believing [was: Part 1 of Paul Smith's 'investigation'
Hi Shannon,
This was very interesting - especially as he / they couldn't see their own blind spot in relation to vaccine concerns.
--
Kind regards,
Fran Sheffield
Homeopathy Plus! (Tutorials - Remedies - Immunisation)
http://www.homeopathyplus.com.au
Do No Harm Initiative (Free Information on Homeopathic Immunisation)
http://www.d-n-h.org
Homeopathy for Autism (Guidelines for Treatment - Search for Practitioners)
http://www.homeopathy4autism.com
This was very interesting - especially as he / they couldn't see their own blind spot in relation to vaccine concerns.
--
Kind regards,
Fran Sheffield
Homeopathy Plus! (Tutorials - Remedies - Immunisation)
http://www.homeopathyplus.com.au
Do No Harm Initiative (Free Information on Homeopathic Immunisation)
http://www.d-n-h.org
Homeopathy for Autism (Guidelines for Treatment - Search for Practitioners)
http://www.homeopathy4autism.com
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: article re believing [was: Part 1 of Paul Smith's 'investigation'
Blind spots are like that! 
But it does also raise the issue that we can only make decisions based on the information we have, and evidently his information sources are different from ours.
But it does also raise the issue that we can only make decisions based on the information we have, and evidently his information sources are different from ours.
-
Fran Sheffield
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:00 pm
Re: article re believing [was: Part 1 of Paul Smith's 'investigation'
Yes, though in his case, he isn't completely ignorant in that he acknowledges there are differences in information but rejects the other as being TOTALLY wrong - or am I now responding from my own prejudices? (Quick mental check - no, I'm right!
)
--
Kind regards,
Fran Sheffield
Homeopathy Plus! (Tutorials - Remedies - Immunisation)
http://www.homeopathyplus.com.au
Do No Harm Initiative (Free Information on Homeopathic Immunisation)
http://www.d-n-h.org
Homeopathy for Autism (Guidelines for Treatment - Search for Practitioners)
http://www.homeopathy4autism.com
--
Kind regards,
Fran Sheffield
Homeopathy Plus! (Tutorials - Remedies - Immunisation)
http://www.homeopathyplus.com.au
Do No Harm Initiative (Free Information on Homeopathic Immunisation)
http://www.d-n-h.org
Homeopathy for Autism (Guidelines for Treatment - Search for Practitioners)
http://www.homeopathy4autism.com

