re: the combos conversation

[Theresa Partington]

Bach was classical but not Classical, as wasTchaikovsky, while Mozart was both classical and Classical. In the same way Kent is classical and Classical, Narayani is neither, and Hahnemann was just classical (and Hahnemannian, obviously). Confusing - but if the musicians can live with it perhaps we could, if the alternative was pistols at dawn.
Theresa
Shannon wrote: Some would say that Kent, for e.g., is "classical", but not
"Hahnemannian." Sounds like v.Boenninghausen would also be in that
category.