Scientific medicine, was: Ancient Wisdom and Acute diseases-

[muthu kumar]

critical thinking and doubt for everything old and new, no special
interest and profit upon anything, looking the wider picture of the
situation, and especially love for the human or animal you try to
cure. And obviously, everything needs to be explained, now if possible
or later in the future if not possible.
not! Do we accept them? Of course not! We examine them with a critical
open mind without having any profits in mind to judge positively or
negatively. If we can see something (or some results) but we cannot
explain them, this doesnt mean that this unexplainable theory is
insufficient, this mean that our knowledge is not sufficient enough. i
hope i have answere to your questio. If not, please repeat.
Very good; and it shows that both allopathy and homeopathy fit this
bill- there have been pioneers even in allopathy who have followed or
follow these...there have been many in homeopathy that have diluted
"critical thinking" to 30c and swallow things hook, line and sinker
because it is by luminary homeopaths. This is what I criticize. Once
again accept whatever is good - but at the same time make sure that
what you are doing is as far as possible also provable, repeatable.
Some of the things are not provable- but we still accept those. And do
not jump on allopathic researchers ( all of them) that they are not
doing scientific medicine and that we do it...
Yahoo! Games.

[dimitri rolf]

hahnemannian2002,
im glad we totally agree on this.
Unfortunately, extremists and nihilists exist in both sides.

hahnemannian2002 wrote:
________________________________

We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.