Here is my reply to HT Cotter's rebuttal:
I did not intend my email to be haughty on such a serious topic as HIV/AIDS, I'm sorry you took it that way. My statements are not axiomatic but can be backed by facts and have nothing to do with Homeopathy, but only for Practitioners thinking that they have a magic bullet for HIV.
1. "...you embarrass yourself with this nonsense ("....there is no HIV virus or retrovirus.")."
Response: This is a fact; there is no HIV virus or retrovirus. There is overwhelming evidence that there is no HIV. I know the truth, it's an embarrassment for the Practitioners that do not.
2. "Such claims can be wrongly associated with homeopathy and taint the holistic health movement."
Response: please explain how the claim "that there is no HIV virus" which is made by Holistic Health Organizations in contrast to the Allopathic medical model, taint the alternative health movement? And how can it be wrongly associated with Homeopathy?
3. "Harvey Bialy is not a MD. Nor is he a "leading virologist."
Response: Many websites list the title MD after Bialy's name. It is possible that he has earned or has been honored with that degree, in addition to his PhD degree. Bialy was among the top Scientists invited to be on the panel of the So African conference on AIDS, as was Helene Gayle MD, & Professor Peter Duesberg, in March 2001. Most of the scientific community consider him to be tops in his field. (Bialy is a molecular biologist, my error.)
4. "I for one, would like to see Dr. Helena Gayle's statement that AIDS is not caused by HIV retrovirus. Can you supply the source of that quotation?"
Response: Dr Gayle gave a speech at the above conference, in which she stated; "...we have as yet to find the HIV virus...". Part of her speech was published in the Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients about 1-1/2 to 2 years ago. It should be easy to find at this publication or a Google search.
5."They hardly need be chastised or 'awakened' by these second-hand assertions."
Response: I did not intend to chasten anyone, but yes, awaken those Practitioners who still believe in the Allopathic medical model of HIV=AIDS.
6."The people to whom you're making these first order statements are representative and emblematic of those who are curing patients with this disease."
Response: AIDS is not a disease, either chronic or acute. The name refers to a deficient immune system. Johns Hopkins Medical states that AIDS is about 24 different disease conditions as defined in the US and Western Europe, by the CDC.
Many scientists state that, HIV is not the cause of AIDS because it fails to meet the golden rules of Koch & Henley postulates, as well as the six rules of virology. Even the tests for HIV are extremely inaccurate, that is why a "squeaky clean person" can test HIV+ with a cold, or pregnancy. Even an emotional trauma can suppress the immune system of a person and they can test HIV+ at that time.
Also doubtful, Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, co-discoverer of HIV, Institute of Pasteur, Paris, Fr, stated in the Miami Herald, Dec 23, 1999, “There are too many shortcomings in the theory that HIV causes all signs of AIDS”.
Furthermore, while HIV has been correlated with AIDS, there have been many cases of people with AIDS diseases with no evidence of HIV, noted Dr. Charles Thomas, Jr. of the Helicon Foundation, a not-for-profit AIDS organization.
While HIV is reported to be rampant in Africa, its citizens are not dying at high rates from AIDS. Charles Geshekter, PhD. a professor specializing in African studies has taken 12 research trips to Africa and has organized a conference on “Rethinking AIDS”. Professor Geshekter says that AIDS in Africa is a different set of diseases than it is in North America and Western Europe.
How is it possible for a virus to only attack the poor in Africa and not the middle or upper classes?
The definition of AIDS in Africa was agreed to at a WHO conference convened in Central African Republic in late 1985. This definition itself is decisively different than the definitions of an AIDS case in North America or Western Europe. That definition is based on 4 clinical symptoms, which are very widespread and very common throughout Africa. They are: a persistent dry cough, a high fever, loose stools or diarrhea for 30 days, and a 10% loss of body weight over a two-month period.
To compare, AIDS in North America and Western Europe, is characterized by such things as severe immuno-suppression and characteristic opportunistic infections like Kaposi’s sarcoma and candidiasis, whereas African AIDS is associated with other symptoms like wasting disease. In Africa they have always had wasting disease and malaria. A virus should cause the same disease, and in Africa it clearly doesn’t. They’ve just taken all the old diseases, combined with HIV, and called it AIDS. But a lot of people in Africa just have the same diseases they’ve always had.
7. "However, I have yet to find any patient whose body makes antibodies to HIV without exposure to HIV."
AIDS is politically, not medically, defined. There were people who felt that a single-virus theory would be very useful in helping to raise public awareness about the 'disease.' It would help them get the research they thought was necessary and public funding for its treatment by scaring people into believing that while the disease was affecting gay men now, it was eventually going to spread throughout the heterosexual population. This political definition of the disease has proven to be inaccurate and inconsistent with its real medical nature." States Steven Jonas, professor of preventative medicine U/NY at Stony Brook.
“The first rule is that an agent that's going to be blamed for a disease should be able to be isolated from each and every case of the disease," says Dr. Cunningham. "That is not true with HIV and AIDS. It's very, very difficult, in many cases of AIDS, to isolate the virus at all from these individuals. The second step is that you should be able to transmit the agent that is [causing] the infectious disease to another animal and have the disease develop in that animal. To the best of my knowledge, that has never been done with the agent we call HIV. The final step, of course, is to remove the agent from the animal which has been infected, put it into another animal, and transmit the disease in this fashion. This, too, has not occurred with HIV”, states Dr. Roger Cunningham, an immunologist, microbiologist, and the director of the Ernst Witsky Center for Immunology at the School of Medicine at the State University of New York at Buffalo.
I also refer you to an article in Continuum Magazine Vol 5 No.3, by A. Hassig, MD, H. Kremer MD, S Lanka PhD, W. X Liang MD, & K Stamphfli, MD, the summary states that the evidence for the existence of HIV retroviruses was wrong.
Regards,
Bill G.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Sir,
I write this rebuttal to your open letter to Minutus (follows) with some reluctance, since our kind tend to have the least respect for each other’s contrary opinion. However, when such supercilious statements are blatantly suggested to be axiomatic and might be attributed to homeopathy, then a retort is required.
While you might be commented for your zeal, you embarrass yourself with this nonsense ("....there is no HIV virus or retrovirus."). Such claims can be wrongly associated with homeopathy and taint the holistic health movement. Harvey Bialy is not a MD. Nor is he a "leading virologist." I have been developing treatment protocols for this illness since it was called "Slims." Certainly, many AIDS patients have been cured by holistic protocols, as I have cured many in my practice. The people to whom you're making these first order statements are representative and emblematic of those who are curing patients with this disease. They hardly need be chastised or 'awakened' by these second-hand assertions. Most diseases are the sum of the forces that lead the patient into that state from health. However, I have yet to find any patient whose body makes antibodies to HIV without exposure to HIV.
If you have done any original work for which you can speak with authority, then certainly you deserve a listen. I for one, would like to see Dr. Helena Gayle's statement that AIDS is not caused by HIV retrovirus. Can you supply the source of that quotation?
Sincerely,
Dr. H. Thomas Cotter
Author "Homeopathy in the Curing of AIDS" (1984)
Reply to HT Cotter on HIV/AIDS
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: Reply to HT Cotter on HIV/AIDS
Dear Bill
The disease that is consuming a lot of Africans is called HIV/AIDS. Whether
there is an HIV or not is not frankly irrelevant.
In any form of homoeopathy, we are not trying to kill the micro-organism
involved. All we do is to give the vital force of the patient the ability to
shake off its susceptibility to it.
So what ever its cause or source, by the evidence of some senior and
internationally known and respected homoeopaths, PC1 is curing these
patients who seem to be showing a similar set of symptoms across many
countries.
If you like to allocate it a new name other than HIV/AIDS, then feel free -
but tell us how to get international recognition for it so if its to be
called BILL'S SYNDROME every body would understand what we are on about.
The object of the exercise is not to name the disease but to cure the
patient.
Aph 1 - The physician's high and only mission is to restore the sick to
health, to cure, as it is termed.
Aph 2 - The highest ideal of cure is rapid, gentle and permanent restoration
of the health, or removal and annihilation of the disease in its whole
extent, in the shortest, most reliable, and most harmless way, on easily
comprehensible principles.
Hallelujah!
Rgds
Soroush
The disease that is consuming a lot of Africans is called HIV/AIDS. Whether
there is an HIV or not is not frankly irrelevant.
In any form of homoeopathy, we are not trying to kill the micro-organism
involved. All we do is to give the vital force of the patient the ability to
shake off its susceptibility to it.
So what ever its cause or source, by the evidence of some senior and
internationally known and respected homoeopaths, PC1 is curing these
patients who seem to be showing a similar set of symptoms across many
countries.
If you like to allocate it a new name other than HIV/AIDS, then feel free -
but tell us how to get international recognition for it so if its to be
called BILL'S SYNDROME every body would understand what we are on about.
The object of the exercise is not to name the disease but to cure the
patient.
Aph 1 - The physician's high and only mission is to restore the sick to
health, to cure, as it is termed.
Aph 2 - The highest ideal of cure is rapid, gentle and permanent restoration
of the health, or removal and annihilation of the disease in its whole
extent, in the shortest, most reliable, and most harmless way, on easily
comprehensible principles.
Hallelujah!
Rgds
Soroush
Re: Reply to HT Cotter on HIV/AIDS
> From: Finrod
edited
More contradiction then, surely you have to name the disease to focus
on the specific GE - chappell does this, every one of his PC rx has a
disease name to it. Joy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
edited
More contradiction then, surely you have to name the disease to focus
on the specific GE - chappell does this, every one of his PC rx has a
disease name to it. Joy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
Sheri Nakken
- Posts: 3999
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Reply to HT Cotter on HIV/AIDS
BILL G IS 100% accurate.
I too am extremely frustrated when homeopaths won't even look at this and
continue to buy into the lies. Bill & I have posted tons on this and there
is no excuse for any of you.
How pathetic when so many of you won't even look at this. It is so obvious
once you read a few documents. Doesn't require much.
Thanks Bill G for what you have shared.
Sheri
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/epafrica.htm
AIDS in Africa: distinguishing fact and fiction
E. Papadopulos-Eleopulos (1) Valendar F.Turner (2) John M. Papadimitriou
(3) Harvey Bialy (4)
HIV/AIDS, I'm sorry you took it that way. My statements are not axiomatic
but can be backed by facts and have nothing to do with Homeopathy, but only
for Practitioners thinking that they have a magic bullet for HIV.
virus or retrovirus.")."
overwhelming evidence that there is no HIV. I know the truth, it's an
embarrassment for the Practitioners that do not.
holistic health movement."
is made by Holistic Health Organizations in contrast to the Allopathic
medical model, taint the alternative health movement? And how can it be
wrongly associated with Homeopathy?
possible that he has earned or has been honored with that degree, in
addition to his PhD degree. Bialy was among the top Scientists invited to
be on the panel of the So African conference on AIDS, as was Helene Gayle
MD, & Professor Peter Duesberg, in March 2001. Most of the scientific
community consider him to be tops in his field. (Bialy is a molecular
biologist, my error.)
not caused by HIV retrovirus. Can you supply the source of that quotation?"
stated; "...we have as yet to find the HIV virus...". Part of her speech
was published in the Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients about 1-1/2 to
2 years ago. It should be easy to find at this publication or a Google
search.
assertions."
Practitioners who still believe in the Allopathic medical model of HIV=AIDS.
representative and emblematic of those who are curing patients with this
disease."
to a deficient immune system. Johns Hopkins Medical states that AIDS is
about 24 different disease conditions as defined in the US and Western
Europe, by the CDC.
to meet the golden rules of Koch & Henley postulates, as well as the six
rules of virology. Even the tests for HIV are extremely inaccurate, that is
why a "squeaky clean person" can test HIV+ with a cold, or pregnancy. Even
an emotional trauma can suppress the immune system of a person and they can
test HIV+ at that time.
Institute of Pasteur, Paris, Fr, stated in the Miami Herald, Dec 23, 1999,
?There are too many shortcomings in the theory that HIV causes all signs of
AIDS?.
cases of people with AIDS diseases with no evidence of HIV, noted Dr.
Charles Thomas, Jr. of the Helicon Foundation, a not-for-profit AIDS
organization.
at high rates from AIDS. Charles Geshekter, PhD. a professor specializing
in African studies has taken 12 research trips to Africa and has organized
a conference on ?Rethinking AIDS?. Professor Geshekter says that AIDS in
Africa is a different set of diseases than it is in North America and
Western Europe.
the middle or upper classes?
convened in Central African Republic in late 1985. This definition itself
is decisively different than the definitions of an AIDS case in North
America or Western Europe. That definition is based on 4 clinical symptoms,
which are very widespread and very common throughout Africa. They are: a
persistent dry cough, a high fever, loose stools or diarrhea for 30 days,
and a 10% loss of body weight over a two-month period.
such things as severe immuno-suppression and characteristic opportunistic
infections like Kaposi?s sarcoma and candidiasis, whereas African AIDS is
associated with other symptoms like wasting disease. In Africa they have
always had wasting disease and malaria. A virus should cause the same
disease, and in Africa it clearly doesn?t. They?ve just taken all the old
diseases, combined with HIV, and called it AIDS. But a lot of people in
Africa just have the same diseases they?ve always had.
HIV without exposure to HIV."
that a single-virus theory would be very useful in helping to raise public
awareness about the 'disease.' It would help them get the research they
thought was necessary and public funding for its treatment by scaring
people into believing that while the disease was affecting gay men now, it
was eventually going to spread throughout the heterosexual population. This
political definition of the disease has proven to be inaccurate and
inconsistent with its real medical nature." States Steven Jonas, professor
of preventative medicine U/NY at Stony Brook.
should be able to be isolated from each and every case of the disease,"
says Dr. Cunningham. "That is not true with HIV and AIDS. It's very, very
difficult, in many cases of AIDS, to isolate the virus at all from these
individuals. The second step is that you should be able to transmit the
agent that is [causing] the infectious disease to another animal and have
the disease develop in that animal. To the best of my knowledge, that has
never been done with the agent we call HIV. The final step, of course, is
to remove the agent from the animal which has been infected, put it into
another animal, and transmit the disease in this fashion. This, too, has
not occurred with HIV?, states Dr. Roger Cunningham, an immunologist,
microbiologist, and the director of the Ernst Witsky Center for Immunology
at the School of Medicine at the State University of New York at Buffalo.
Hassig, MD, H. Kremer MD, S Lanka PhD, W. X Liang MD, & K Stamphfli, MD,
the summary states that the evidence for the existence of HIV retroviruses
was wrong.
reluctance, since our kind tend to have the least respect for each other?s
contrary opinion. However, when such supercilious statements are blatantly
suggested to be axiomatic and might be attributed to homeopathy, then a
retort is required.
this nonsense ("....there is no HIV virus or retrovirus."). Such claims
can be wrongly associated with homeopathy and taint the holistic health
movement. Harvey Bialy is not a MD. Nor is he a "leading virologist." I
have been developing treatment protocols for this illness since it was
called "Slims." Certainly, many AIDS patients have been cured by holistic
protocols, as I have cured many in my practice. The people to whom you're
making these first order statements are representative and emblematic of
those who are curing patients with this disease. They hardly need be
chastised or 'awakened' by these second-hand assertions. Most diseases are
the sum of the forces that lead the patient into that state from health.
However, I have yet to find any patient whose body makes antibodies to HIV
without exposure to HIV.
then certainly you deserve a listen. I for one, would like to see Dr.
Helena Gayle's statement that AIDS is not caused by HIV retrovirus. Can
you supply the source of that quotation?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936
I too am extremely frustrated when homeopaths won't even look at this and
continue to buy into the lies. Bill & I have posted tons on this and there
is no excuse for any of you.
How pathetic when so many of you won't even look at this. It is so obvious
once you read a few documents. Doesn't require much.
Thanks Bill G for what you have shared.
Sheri
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/epafrica.htm
AIDS in Africa: distinguishing fact and fiction
E. Papadopulos-Eleopulos (1) Valendar F.Turner (2) John M. Papadimitriou
(3) Harvey Bialy (4)
HIV/AIDS, I'm sorry you took it that way. My statements are not axiomatic
but can be backed by facts and have nothing to do with Homeopathy, but only
for Practitioners thinking that they have a magic bullet for HIV.
virus or retrovirus.")."
overwhelming evidence that there is no HIV. I know the truth, it's an
embarrassment for the Practitioners that do not.
holistic health movement."
is made by Holistic Health Organizations in contrast to the Allopathic
medical model, taint the alternative health movement? And how can it be
wrongly associated with Homeopathy?
possible that he has earned or has been honored with that degree, in
addition to his PhD degree. Bialy was among the top Scientists invited to
be on the panel of the So African conference on AIDS, as was Helene Gayle
MD, & Professor Peter Duesberg, in March 2001. Most of the scientific
community consider him to be tops in his field. (Bialy is a molecular
biologist, my error.)
not caused by HIV retrovirus. Can you supply the source of that quotation?"
stated; "...we have as yet to find the HIV virus...". Part of her speech
was published in the Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients about 1-1/2 to
2 years ago. It should be easy to find at this publication or a Google
search.
assertions."
Practitioners who still believe in the Allopathic medical model of HIV=AIDS.
representative and emblematic of those who are curing patients with this
disease."
to a deficient immune system. Johns Hopkins Medical states that AIDS is
about 24 different disease conditions as defined in the US and Western
Europe, by the CDC.
to meet the golden rules of Koch & Henley postulates, as well as the six
rules of virology. Even the tests for HIV are extremely inaccurate, that is
why a "squeaky clean person" can test HIV+ with a cold, or pregnancy. Even
an emotional trauma can suppress the immune system of a person and they can
test HIV+ at that time.
Institute of Pasteur, Paris, Fr, stated in the Miami Herald, Dec 23, 1999,
?There are too many shortcomings in the theory that HIV causes all signs of
AIDS?.
cases of people with AIDS diseases with no evidence of HIV, noted Dr.
Charles Thomas, Jr. of the Helicon Foundation, a not-for-profit AIDS
organization.
at high rates from AIDS. Charles Geshekter, PhD. a professor specializing
in African studies has taken 12 research trips to Africa and has organized
a conference on ?Rethinking AIDS?. Professor Geshekter says that AIDS in
Africa is a different set of diseases than it is in North America and
Western Europe.
the middle or upper classes?
convened in Central African Republic in late 1985. This definition itself
is decisively different than the definitions of an AIDS case in North
America or Western Europe. That definition is based on 4 clinical symptoms,
which are very widespread and very common throughout Africa. They are: a
persistent dry cough, a high fever, loose stools or diarrhea for 30 days,
and a 10% loss of body weight over a two-month period.
such things as severe immuno-suppression and characteristic opportunistic
infections like Kaposi?s sarcoma and candidiasis, whereas African AIDS is
associated with other symptoms like wasting disease. In Africa they have
always had wasting disease and malaria. A virus should cause the same
disease, and in Africa it clearly doesn?t. They?ve just taken all the old
diseases, combined with HIV, and called it AIDS. But a lot of people in
Africa just have the same diseases they?ve always had.
HIV without exposure to HIV."
that a single-virus theory would be very useful in helping to raise public
awareness about the 'disease.' It would help them get the research they
thought was necessary and public funding for its treatment by scaring
people into believing that while the disease was affecting gay men now, it
was eventually going to spread throughout the heterosexual population. This
political definition of the disease has proven to be inaccurate and
inconsistent with its real medical nature." States Steven Jonas, professor
of preventative medicine U/NY at Stony Brook.
should be able to be isolated from each and every case of the disease,"
says Dr. Cunningham. "That is not true with HIV and AIDS. It's very, very
difficult, in many cases of AIDS, to isolate the virus at all from these
individuals. The second step is that you should be able to transmit the
agent that is [causing] the infectious disease to another animal and have
the disease develop in that animal. To the best of my knowledge, that has
never been done with the agent we call HIV. The final step, of course, is
to remove the agent from the animal which has been infected, put it into
another animal, and transmit the disease in this fashion. This, too, has
not occurred with HIV?, states Dr. Roger Cunningham, an immunologist,
microbiologist, and the director of the Ernst Witsky Center for Immunology
at the School of Medicine at the State University of New York at Buffalo.
Hassig, MD, H. Kremer MD, S Lanka PhD, W. X Liang MD, & K Stamphfli, MD,
the summary states that the evidence for the existence of HIV retroviruses
was wrong.
reluctance, since our kind tend to have the least respect for each other?s
contrary opinion. However, when such supercilious statements are blatantly
suggested to be axiomatic and might be attributed to homeopathy, then a
retort is required.
this nonsense ("....there is no HIV virus or retrovirus."). Such claims
can be wrongly associated with homeopathy and taint the holistic health
movement. Harvey Bialy is not a MD. Nor is he a "leading virologist." I
have been developing treatment protocols for this illness since it was
called "Slims." Certainly, many AIDS patients have been cured by holistic
protocols, as I have cured many in my practice. The people to whom you're
making these first order statements are representative and emblematic of
those who are curing patients with this disease. They hardly need be
chastised or 'awakened' by these second-hand assertions. Most diseases are
the sum of the forces that lead the patient into that state from health.
However, I have yet to find any patient whose body makes antibodies to HIV
without exposure to HIV.
then certainly you deserve a listen. I for one, would like to see Dr.
Helena Gayle's statement that AIDS is not caused by HIV retrovirus. Can
you supply the source of that quotation?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: Reply to HT Cotter on HIV/AIDS
Dear Joy
You are in an unaccommodating mood / mode today, aren't you?
I am saying it is CALLED HIV/AIDS (we all know whatever it is by its
symptoms) - then if someone does not like it, then they can call it
something else but must have a mechanism to make the name internationally
recognised.
If something is called BIGPOX, by convention we can agree what are its
symptoms. If for some reason by another convention ONLY the name is changed
to LITTLEPOX do the symptoms change? No. Do we need to change the specific
remedy for it? NO!
Rgds
Soroush
You are in an unaccommodating mood / mode today, aren't you?
I am saying it is CALLED HIV/AIDS (we all know whatever it is by its
symptoms) - then if someone does not like it, then they can call it
something else but must have a mechanism to make the name internationally
recognised.
If something is called BIGPOX, by convention we can agree what are its
symptoms. If for some reason by another convention ONLY the name is changed
to LITTLEPOX do the symptoms change? No. Do we need to change the specific
remedy for it? NO!
Rgds
Soroush
Re: Reply to HT Cotter on HIV/AIDS
On the contrary I have been very accomodating, seeing as it was
supposed to be a day off for writing and not getting engulfed in
emails.
We do not know what it is by its sx - the politics, the truth and the
myths deny us that.
You said we shouldn't name the disease but I am inclined to say we
should but the name has to be accurate and I am also inclined to say
that HIV/AIDS isn't accurate enough as a name. Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
supposed to be a day off for writing and not getting engulfed in
emails.
We do not know what it is by its sx - the politics, the truth and the
myths deny us that.
You said we shouldn't name the disease but I am inclined to say we
should but the name has to be accurate and I am also inclined to say
that HIV/AIDS isn't accurate enough as a name. Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
H.T. Cotter
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 4:18 pm
Re: Reply to HT Cotter on HIV/AIDS
Hi Bill,
All the data and arguments not withstanding, there was that one thing I asked you about in my original letter, and believe me, this is written with respect for what I assume is a fellow healer. I had assumed you were a fellow homeopath, now, based upon your response, I'm uncertain. However, what original work have you done on this whole topic? Are you merely arguing the positions of other people who seem to be raising more questions than creating positive answers. What have you done to discover more about the nature of AIDS or find curing techniques or protocols for it? As I said to you in my original letter to you, that is something to which I would be glad to examine and respectfully respond. If you are merely riding the coat tails of some researchers, then you have to qualify everything you say, since it's not to your own knowledge, nor have you added to that knowledge base. Thus, your remark that there is no virus or retrovirus (grammatically incorrect if you meant it only respecting the disease of AIDS) and lets not banty terms, if you treat people week in and out with this disease, as I do, you don't care if it's technically a syndrome or a FDA defined disease. It is definitely a dis-ease to the patients who are ill with it. Kindly respond to your own experience, not merely what you've read of other's opinions or work, and we'll not get lost in sophomoric medically specious fecundity.
Sincerely,
Dr. Thomas Cotter
All the data and arguments not withstanding, there was that one thing I asked you about in my original letter, and believe me, this is written with respect for what I assume is a fellow healer. I had assumed you were a fellow homeopath, now, based upon your response, I'm uncertain. However, what original work have you done on this whole topic? Are you merely arguing the positions of other people who seem to be raising more questions than creating positive answers. What have you done to discover more about the nature of AIDS or find curing techniques or protocols for it? As I said to you in my original letter to you, that is something to which I would be glad to examine and respectfully respond. If you are merely riding the coat tails of some researchers, then you have to qualify everything you say, since it's not to your own knowledge, nor have you added to that knowledge base. Thus, your remark that there is no virus or retrovirus (grammatically incorrect if you meant it only respecting the disease of AIDS) and lets not banty terms, if you treat people week in and out with this disease, as I do, you don't care if it's technically a syndrome or a FDA defined disease. It is definitely a dis-ease to the patients who are ill with it. Kindly respond to your own experience, not merely what you've read of other's opinions or work, and we'll not get lost in sophomoric medically specious fecundity.
Sincerely,
Dr. Thomas Cotter