Name and penetration

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Fran Sheffield
Posts: 676
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:00 pm

Name and penetration

Post by Fran Sheffield »

Hello all,

Can anyone help me with this? Do the Hepatitis nosodes have a
"name"? - ie: hepatatinum B or some such?

Also, does anybody have a background in hom. pharmacy to help me with
this one. Are some base pilules better for medicating than others? For
example I have remedies on different base pilules, depending on what
base I requested and in other instances, just what the pharmacy
supplied. Some pilules are made from a seemingly hard, non-porous
lactose, some seem to be made from a porous sucrose and some from a
sucrose, starch mixture that is also hard and non-porous.

With such differences in the base pilule, does this affect the
nature/size of the dose? Would the porous one carry more "dose" than
the non-porous one?

Dear Julian is no longer here to help with this one but I can remember
him in the past writing that the base pilule is fully penetrated and
not just surface-coated by the medicating liquid (he said this was
demonstrated by medicating the pilule with a dyed liquid and then
cutting it open -- one could see that the dye had penetrated to the
middle of the pilule). His comment came up in a discussion on whether
handling the pilule would remove the remedy. I can see that such
penetration would be true with my porous pilules but not with my
non-porous ones. Does this difference make much difference?

--
Best regards,
Fran mailto:FranSheffield@homeopathyplus.com.au


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”