NCH Press Release - Prominent US Scientists Counter LancetClaims on Homeopathy

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Sheri Nakken
Posts: 3999
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

NCH Press Release - Prominent US Scientists Counter LancetClaims on Homeopathy

Post by Sheri Nakken »

http://www.homeopathic.org/pressrelease082505.html

NCH Press Release
August 25, 2005

Contact: Peter Gold
860.674.1500 (office)
860.874.7743 (cell)
Email: peter_gold@goldorluk.com

Prominent U.S. Research Scientists Counter Lancet Claims On Homeopathy

Alexandria, VA.:

Prominent U.S. scientists today strongly rejected findings on homeopathic
medicine to be published in the August 27, 2005 edition of the Lancet. The
study in question was the work of Aijing Shang and colleagues from the
University of Berne in Switzerland. The U.S. scientists rejecting the
conclusions of the study are Dr. Rustum Roy Ph.D. (Penn State University),
Dr. Iris Bell, M.D., Ph.D. (University of Arizona) and Dr. Joyce Frye D.O.,
M.B.A. (University of Pennsylvania).

"Shang et al. have successfully applied a methodological approach to the
articles they reviewed that is highly suitable for drawing conclusions
about conventional medicine but is incomplete in evaluating homeopathic
medicine. They did not include criteria that would apply to high quality
homeopathic research reflecting the nature of homeopathic practice. Such
criteria include consideration of the quality of the homeopathy provided",
said Iris Bell, M.D., Ph.D.

"Furthermore, a single remedy selection for a given
conventionally-diagnosed condition is not homeopathy, yet there are
numerous conventionally-judged high quality studies that were so designed.
The analogy would be to test the effects of penicillin for all patients
with symptoms of an apparent infection. The quality of the studies would
otherwise be excellent in design. However, penicillin will not work for
patients with viral infections or bacterial infections resistant to its
effects or for persons with fevers from other non-infectious causes - and
it thus might show benefit only for a subset of patients with symptoms of
infections, i.e., the ones with true penicillin-sensitive infections. How
would penicillin fare in a meta-analysis of studies designed to ignore the
intrinsic nature of penicillin in benefiting patients?" said Bell.

Joyce Frye DO, MBA commented that the study's authors seemed to begin their
work with a bias. "While their analysis clearly showed effects of
homeopathic treatment - they found ways to disregard those. Out of the
millions of trials in conventional medicine, their primary outcome relied
on the comparison of ridiculously small numbers--8 trials of homeopathy and
6 trials of conventional medicine. They began their work with the
assumption 'that the effects observed in placebo-controlled trials of
homoeopathy could be explained by a combination of methodological
deficiencies and biased reporting'. Sound research is not conducted from
this starting position."

Among other topics, the Lancet challenges the plausibility of homeopathic
effects given that homeopathic remedies are often administered in dilutions
in excess of Avogadro's number. Dr. Rustum Roy, Ph.D. distinguished
material scientist from Penn State University commented that the chemistry
argument made in this study and by conventional medicine in general is
false science. "The underpinning of the editorial content of the Lancet as
it relates to homeopathy relies on a quaint old idea from the nineteenth
century that the ONLY way that the property of water can be affected or
changed is by incorporating foreign molecules. This is the Avogadro-limit
high-school level chemistry argument. To a materials scientist this notion
is absurd, since the fundamental paradigm of materials-science is that the
structure-property relationship is the basic determinant of everything. It
is a fact that the structure of water and therefore the informational
content of water can be altered in infinite ways"



Home | About NCH | Join Us | Contact | Site Index
Intro | Membership | Media | Research | Resources | Training | Find a
Homeopath

National Center for Homeopathy
801 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 306 Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(877) 624-0613 (703) 548-7790 fax: (703) 548-7792
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Classical Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”