Codex being voted in the USA starting next week-OT

[Rosemary C Hyde, Ph.D., C.C.H.]

Does anyone know who was actually representing the different countries in this group? Thanks. Rosemary

[Sara Klein Ridgley, Ph.D.]

Rosemary,
Here is the list of the supposedly neutral US Delegation to Codex
(presumably the Canadian one is as "neutral"):

From the corporate sector, official Codex participants include Amway Corp.,
Wyeth Pharmaceutical Co., DSM Nutritional Products, Mead Johnson
Nutritionals, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Nestle USA, Herbalife
International, and a trade group called the Council for Responsible
Nutrition (CRN). The latter's Web site features a "Myth vs. Facts" on
Codex, which, to be blunt, is a self-serving spin that underplays the
negative ramifications of the guidelines on mom & pop supplement businesses.
CRN's membership includes Archer Daniels Midland Co., Cargill Health & Food
Technologies, Bayer Corp., Wyeth Consumer Health, Weider Nutrition
International Inc., Shaklee Corp., Nutraceutical Corp., Herbalife
International of America, Kemin Foods, General Nutrition Centers, Inc.,
Cadbury Adams USA LLC, DSM Nutritional Products, Eastman Chemical Company,
Mingtai Chemical LLC, and Monsanto Life Sciences Company. (A number of
these corporations have several voices at the meetings, since
representatives of corporate subsidiaries sit alongside participants from
their parent companies. And corporate-funded lobby groups have separate
voices.)
Lots of MLM¹s there. I don¹t know what to make of it.

Sara
"Rosemary C Hyde, Ph.D., C.C.H." wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Tanya Marquette]

i would imagine the multi-level marketing networks are very concerned about
the codex. if approved here, it would make their products drugs and liable
to the
drug provings that pharm cos have to perform.

my concern is how did they get to the table? is their gross corp income so
great
that they have enough economic clout to wield against big pharma?

tanya
Corp.,
businesses.
Food
in this
supplements) and
"How
Representatives
already),
will
won
"globalization" of
Representative
Thank you
the
laws and
of our
overriding
even-broader Free
North
would
Americas in
text to
all
special-interest
all its
for the
following
HREF="http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bi ... R_Final_Te
xt
s/Section_Index.html">http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/C
AF
read the
as
added)
safety
when they
health-freedom
of
the
allowed to
would
2005.
2005.
without
time.
VOTE
CLOSE.
for
Homoeopathy and
regarding the
read or
email
remains
punitive
change your
daily
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Service.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Homoeopathy and
regarding the
read or
email
remains
punitive
your
daily
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a
single daily digest.

[Rosemary C Hyde, Ph.D., C.C.H.]

I know this is off-topic, but it's also extremely relevant to many of us.
THESE are the health experts that get to dictate virtually the whole world's
access to supplements?????

How did they get so powerful that governments everywhere have acceded to
whatever they decide?

And I'd expect all those MLMs to assure that their supplements (admittedly
generally of pretty low quality) somehow get to be on the accepted list -- I
don't understand the dynamics of this whole thing. Not to mention that
there's something totally surreal about delegates of this ilk making laws
that affect everyone's health.

I asked the question so I'd know how to approach writing to my legislators.
But I can't see from this list why legislators anywhere would take this
seriously, aside from the money represented. Where can one get a better
perspective on what's really going on?

Thanks, Rosemary

[Sara Klein Ridgley, Ph.D.]

Tanya,

The MLM¹s are HUGE. Each one of the mentioned in the list is more than 1
BILLION $US in sales per annum!

They have in place lots of eager Œsellers¹ and buyers of all their products,
and therefore, if the prices go way up ( as they did in Germany, more than
10 fold on e.g., Echinacea tincture...) they will only make more money.

Most of these companies pride themselves of using the highest quality USP
grade ingredients. (that is, US Pharmaceutical grade...).

One is baffled....

Sara
"Tanya Marquette" wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Shannon Nelson]

Sounds like "representing" would be an overstatement...

[Shannon Nelson]

Rosemary-
For ideas on how to approach it, have you looked at the several links
that have been sent? They give good background and summary
information. The letters they offer as samples are (with so far one
exception) pretty long and detailed, and I wonder whether that is more
or less useful than just a few lines stating your own basic opinions on
the matter.

Apparently the main message we need to send (and should have started
long ago, had we known how and where) is that we don't want our
supplements restricted in this way, and that we don't want to be forced
to "harmonize" (yuk) with other nations in this matter. Ask that the
CAFTA legislation be rejected and sent back for re-write, to remove the
planned "harmonization" with reference to foods and supplements. (I
suspect most of us would want to scrap the whole thing, but confess I
haven't read it...)
Shannon
Sara wrote:

[Tanya Marquette]

ah--thanks for the info
the co's that i have dealt with have always indicated they used organic
products. i guess one should never believe anything from any corporate
body.

tanya
products,
about
liable
income so
week-OT
on
the
&
Inc.,
Company,
of
from
separate
countries
week
eliminate their
Germany.
Senate
Codex
hard
(by
restriction).
to be
require
food
harmonization
the
typical
and
written
etc.);
bureaucratic
of
committee
the SPS
the
HREF="http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bi ... R_Final_Te
s/Section_Index.html">http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/C
will
measures on
measures on
(emphasis
Representatives
Education Act
harmonize to
that
1st,
11,
any
TO
WILL BE
LETTERS.

here
document
and/or
individual
special,
single
Complementary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
of
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
document
and/or
individual
special,
change
single
Homoeopathy
out
site
change
Homoeopathy and
regarding the
read or
email
remains
punitive
your
daily
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a
single daily digest.