Read on…
History and Explanation of Similia Similibus Separatus
You can take any number of allopathic medicines, combinations of
herbal drugs, prick all over your body with acupuncture needles and
as long as you take just a single medicine in homeopathy –it is
homeopathy…. Hey but just add one more homeopathic medicine to this
above mixture then you are a goner…
You can apply sun screen all over like nobody's business, apply
mascara, antiperspirants, wear a mixture of perfumes and lie in a
medicated bath soaking up the stuff, put breast implants and set
right a sagging face with Botox injections but still if you are
taking a single medicine (whether it is even the similimum is
another question) then it is homeopathy; you add one more
homeopathic medicine to the above then it is not homeopathy.
You noticed some members had commented how even carrying some
medicines in their pockets affected them, aggravated them and even
cured them… Perchance if they had taken 2 or 3 medicines in their
pocket – oops… they are not taking homeopathic medicines…it is not
homeopathy…
Hahnemann observed that there are such "mix and match mongrels"
among the exalted folk that he decided to create another law to
separate the mongrels from the "true elvish" and he wanted to call
this law of separation – similia similibus separatus. Melanie did
not approve of this as she was afraid of the connotations of the
word "separate us" when she had recently ensnared Hahnemann. She did
not want him to get any more separation ideas in his mind –this was
romantic Paris- So she was totally against this …But you cannot win
against the master – the old stick-in-the-mud…
He wrote to Hering and Boenninghausen… Unfortunately Hering had just
fallen off his 2 – legged stool ( and that is how he found out that
for stability a stool requires 3 legs) and on top of a passing
Lachesis snake. So for sometime after that he was preoccupied with
running from it wearing loose garments ( you cannot have anything
tight when you have just come in close contact with Lachesis) and so
did not register this fact.
Baron had just been kicked by his favorite horse in the stable and
he was prone (literally) to thinking about all his famous Quis?
Quid? Ubi? Quibus auxiliis? Cur? Quomodo? Quando? questions … for
location he was wondering whether to put the anatomical region that
was kicked upon or the stable where the kick was delivered… finally
like the true Generalization master that he was, he concluded "in
general horse kicks are bad wherever they are delivered". Any way
Hahnemann's new law did not strike him as much or as noticeably as
the horse's hoof.
Unfazed Hahnemann put this in Sixth edition in a way Melanie cannot
find out. This talk about LM drugs is really about this Mongrel
practice. LM stands for Least Mongrel… LM 0/1 is when you add only
one medicine to the indicated remedy so it is a combination of 2
medicines, LM0/2 is when you add 2 more to the indicated – so it is
a combination of 3 etc… You know the flow… If someone gives
different interpretations of the Sixth edition and LM potencies –
they have not read the original works as I did – reading between the
lines. Hahnemann in a true Freemason spirit wrote between the lines
using a secret method- the text can only be seen by applying a
carefully prepared CM potency of Causticum in between the lines
spread over aphorisms 210 to 270.
Now that I have explained the law, I have done my homeopathic civic
duty of explaining what LM stands for – a classification to identify
what is homeopathy and what is not and to what extent there is a
difference. Please go forth and label people who give 2 or more
medicines as LM 0/2, 0/3, 0/4 etc.
Similia Similibus Separatus
Yours in all insincerity
Hahnemannian
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Joy Lucas wrote:
then
(as
you
whatever
prepared
in
isn't
predominates
situation, if
must
prescription for
should
given), so we
all
separate
might
medicines/remedies or
cannot
one rx
and
Dolisos
IV of
working
twice
Oregano
doctor was
that
genetic
compromised. I'd
work
remedy may
my
that when
there have
be the
forth. I am
that
expound
no
for any
with the
individual
simply
receive
recommendation
any
the
special,
to
Terms of
)