On 10 May 2004 almondsl@aol.com wrote: " All this hair splitting about the
vital force gives me a
headache. Instead, why don't we devise ways to prove homeopathy to the
establishment
so we can simultaneously kick Jim Randi in the slats, take his million
dollar
bounty--then force the insurance companies to cough up coverage so people's
medical insurance will cover homeopathy. I've know it works. You know it
works. Why do all the public outings in major media end in embarrassment?
REPLY FROM DR. V. KRISHNAMURTHY:
Dear George Ugolino, Please make clear your point. I am unable to
understand what you want to say. Yes I am proving that homeopathy is
suprior. Please let me know what is means y "Jim Randi"
Thank you.
headache.
Re: headache.
Dr. Krishnamurthy,
James Randi is easily found in an internet search. He represents the
type who will settle for nothing less than double blind, replicable proofs in
laboratories recognized by conventional (allopathic) medicine. A fairly
obnoxious character who has offered a million dollar bounty to anyone who can prove
the validity of homeopathy.
You have this faction in the east as well--it is not unique to the
west.
Anna, I believe, mentioned that Randi may try to welch (not pay if he
loses):
So much the better for us, provided we have everything on videotape and in
writing! You can't buy that kind of publicity for a million bucks.
Dana Ullman's episode with Randi and Stossel did not go well for us,
but at the risk of commiting poetry, I exhort you all to come up with something
that will stick to the wall!
George Ugolini
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
James Randi is easily found in an internet search. He represents the
type who will settle for nothing less than double blind, replicable proofs in
laboratories recognized by conventional (allopathic) medicine. A fairly
obnoxious character who has offered a million dollar bounty to anyone who can prove
the validity of homeopathy.
You have this faction in the east as well--it is not unique to the
west.
Anna, I believe, mentioned that Randi may try to welch (not pay if he
loses):
So much the better for us, provided we have everything on videotape and in
writing! You can't buy that kind of publicity for a million bucks.
Dana Ullman's episode with Randi and Stossel did not go well for us,
but at the risk of commiting poetry, I exhort you all to come up with something
that will stick to the wall!
George Ugolini
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

