I don't think you should consider puls.
Con or maybe sulph and lyco seem more indicated.
best regards
Elham
Re. puls question
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Re. puls question
Thanks Elham,
I agree that sulph(!) and Lyc seem much better indicated, but (sigh) both
seem to have failed...
Ah well,

on 9/13/03 1:03 PM, elham at elham@zyberwayavadh.com wrote:
I agree that sulph(!) and Lyc seem much better indicated, but (sigh) both
seem to have failed...
Ah well,
on 9/13/03 1:03 PM, elham at elham@zyberwayavadh.com wrote:

